More stories

  • in

    The Turner Prize Has Shortlisted These Four Artists, Who Share a Sense of ‘Tenderness and Humanity’

    This morning, Tate Britain made its annual announcement of the four artists shortlisted for this year’s Turner Prize: Jesse Darling, Ghislaine Leung, Rory Pilgrim, and Barbara Walker. Their work will be exhibited at Towner Eastbourne museum in East Sussex from September 28 to April 14, 2024, with the winner later crowned at an award ceremony on December 5.
    British artist Barbara Walker, 58, reflects on her life and the experiences of those around her on a range of scales, from intimate studies on paper to large murals. She was nominated for her “Burden of Proof,” exhibited at the current Sharjah Biennial (until June 11), a series of sensitive charcoal portrayals of people impacted by the Windrush Scandal, which saw hundreds of Caribbean workers who arrived to the U.K. between 1948 and 1971 wrongly detained or deported. Identity papers documenting the sitters’ right to remain have been layered into some of Walker’s portraits.
    Ghislaine Leung, 42, a Swedish artist based in London, was nominated for the show “Fountains” at Simian in Copenhagen earlier this year. Known for her use of a “score,” or a set of instructions, in her artworks, Leung’s direction is always open to interpretation by the specific gallery working in collaboration with her. For example, the score for Fountains (2022) read, “a fountain installed in the exhibition space to cancel sound,” which led Simian to make use of its subterranean location beneath a public fountain to allow water to cascade down into the gallery space.
    Installation view of Jesse Darling, “No Medals, No Ribbons” at Modern Art Oxford, 2022. Photo: Ben Westoby, © Modern Art Oxford.
    The British-born, Berlin-based artist Jesse Darling, 41, makes installations from a range of materials and was nominated for two solo exhibitions from 2022: “No Medals, No Ribbons” at Modern Art Oxford and “Enclosures” at Camden Art Centre in London. The Oxford show was the largest of his career, and featured precarious sculptures stitched together using everyday items that had been strangely anthropomorphized, as in the case of plastic bags with metal limbs or a roller-coaster track rewrought into a misshapen, skeletal form.
    The British artist Rory Pilgrim, 35, who works between the U.K. and The Netherlands, was nominated for RAFTS, a film commissioned last year by the Serpentine in London. Using music and song, he explores the symbol of a raft as a last resort structure during challenging times brought on by the pandemic and the climate crisis. It features perspectives voiced by eight residents of Barking and Dagenham in East London.
    Though there is no obvious common thread between the shortlisted artists as was the case last year, when the cohort were all women or non-binary, but Tate Britian’s director Alex Farquharson commented that vulnerability was a shared theme, with each of the artworks speaking to “social themes, social structures, as well as a real sense of tenderness and humanity.”
    One of the world’s most important accolades for contemporary art since 1984, the Turner Prize is known for showcasing radical artistic practices that have historically sparked debate. This year’s jury, chaired by Farquharson, comprises Martin Clark, director of Camden Art Centre, Cédric Fauq, chief curator at Capc Musée d’Art Contemporain de Bordeaux, Melanie Keen, director of the Wellcome Collection and Helen Nisbet, artistic director at Art Night.
    The award ceremony on December 5 will take place at Eastbourne’s Winter Gardens, with a prize of £25,000 for the winner and £10,000 for each runner-up.
    Follow Artnet News on Facebook: Want to stay ahead of the art world? Subscribe to our newsletter to get the breaking news, eye-opening interviews, and incisive critical takes that drive the conversation forward. More

  • in

    After Discovering a Trove of Odd, Extraordinary Paintings in a Thrift Store, Artist Andy Holden Is Bringing the Little-Known Artist to Light

    Occasionally someone is lucky enough to come across forgotten or undervalued treasure in a charity shop, but it’s not often that they accidentally find an artist’s entire oeuvre. This is what happened to British artist Andy Holden, who discovered not only a collection of paintings by artist Hermione Burton, who died in 2007, but also her framed photographs and self-published autobiography while rifling through a shop in his hometown of Bedford a few years ago.
    Now, Holden is presenting more than 20 of the artist’s paintings alongside his own interpretative films in the exhibition “Full of Days” at the Gallery of Everything in London.
    With her slightly naive style, Burton would be classified as an outsider or self-taught artist today, but Holden was immediately drawn to her works’ fantastical, otherworldly nature. After reading her autobiography, which narrates the events of her life as well as delving into her lifelong struggle with rheumatic heart disease, Holden even tracked down some of her subjects to record their memories of Burton.
    A still from Andy Holden, Kingdom of the Sick. Image courtesy of Andy Holden.
    In the exhibition’s longest film, Kingdom of the Sick, which runs for 40 minutes, a motion capture animated version of Burton played by musician Sarah Cracknell is brought to life in the artist’s trademark red beret. The documentary/biopic gives audiences an overview of her life before offering Holden’s own interpretation of this found material that seeks to explore the ways in which sickness and grief can affect our experiences of time.
    Burton was born in 1926 in Aylesbury, Buckinghamshire, but later moved with her second husband to live the U.S., where she became the one of the first-ever patients to undergo open-heart surgery. It was during her recovery that she turned to art.
    Made homesick one day by hearing Tom Jones’s Green Green Grass of Home on the radio, she returned to England where she met her third husband, Frank Burton. As her health continued to decline and she was forced to undergo more surgery, Burton kept up her artistic practice and slowly started to gain local recognition, even exhibiting at the Gallery in Wellingborough in 1987.
    As Burton frequently painted herself and those that were close to her, Holden has read her undated artworks as though they are a diary, but one without a strict linear structure. He has searched for narrative clues elsewhere. For example, perspectival shifts in the composition that might easily be written off as technical ineptitude have instead been read by Holden as being intentional expressions of a change in Burton’s worldview.
    Through his own study of Burton’s art, Holden prompts the viewer to consider both the tempting possibilities and the limitations of interpreting the work that any artist leaves behind.
    Preview some of Hermione Burton’s paintings below.
    Installation view of “Full of Days” exhibition at the Gallery of Everything in London. Photo: Jorge Antony Stride.
    Hermione Burton, Did She Fall or Was She Pushed?. Image courtesy of Andy Holden.
    Hermione Burton, God Bless You, Vicar. Image courtesy of Andy Holden.
    Hermione Burton, Untitled. Image courtesy of Andy Holden.
    Hermione Burton, Untitled. Image courtesy of Andy Holden.
    Hermione Burton, Jacqui’s Father. Image courtesy of Andy Holden.
    Hermione Burton, Pleasant Thoughts, Jacqui on a plinth. Image courtesy of Andy Holden.
    Hermione Burton, Still Life. Image courtesy of Andy Holden.
    “Full of Days” is on view at the Gallery of Everything, 4 Chiltern St, London, through April 30.
    Follow Artnet News on Facebook: Want to stay ahead of the art world? Subscribe to our newsletter to get the breaking news, eye-opening interviews, and incisive critical takes that drive the conversation forward. More

  • in

    Counterpublic’s 2023 Exhibition in St. Louis Shakes Up the Formulaic—and Often Problematic—Shape of American Triennials

    “What is needed now, and what is needed next?” 
    This is one of the prompts offered by James McAnally, the founder and director of St. Louis’s recurring Counterpublic exhibition, in an op-ed published on this site in 2021. On McAnally’s mind at the time was the function of bi- and triennial art events like his, and how they might better realize the kind of meaningful communal impact to which they so often aspire. The second Counterpublic, he promised, would be a “singular civic platform meant to reimagine how art engages the contexts, textures, and futures of St. Louis.” 
    Fast forward two years and Counterpublic 2023 is now open. It unfolds across 25 locations situated along a six-mile stretch of Jefferson Avenue—a street that spans numerous neighborhoods and socioeconomic spaces. As an orientative form, it also subverts St. Louis’s status as the “Gateway to the West”: a portal through which settlers once passed in the name of manifest destiny. “These neighborhoods are microcosms of the nation in so many ways,” McAnally said upon announcing the show last year. “They are truly dynamic and resistant to one another. They’re not a single experience.” 
    The exhibition doesn’t offer a single experience either. For this year’s edition, McAnally’s brought on what he calls an “ensemble” of young curators—Allison Glenn, Risa Puleo, Katherine Simóne Reynolds, Diya Vij, and the artistic collective New Red Order—who were each tasked with organizing site-specific projects along the show’s route. Collectively, the group represents a range of academic interests and curatorial impulses. Those impulses don’t always align. 
    As such, this year’s Counterpublic is an exhibition of fascinating contradictions. They give the show its thrust. At stake here, against the backdrop of the heartland and its history of industrial capitalism and land dispossession, is a broader consideration not just of how we can use art to incur change, but whether or not art can incur change at all.  
    The curatorial ensemble for Counterpublic 2023. Clockwise from left: Allison Glenn, courtesy of Rana Young; Diya Vij; Katherine Reynolds; Risa Puleo, courtesy of Gonzalo Reyes Rodriguez; James McAnally; New Red Order.
    Launched in 2019, Counterpublic arrived amidst a group of similarly shaped bi- and triennials established in middle-American cities over the last 15 years—Open Spaces in Kansas City and FotoFocus in Cincinnati among them. At the core of many of these events is a similar mission: to revitalize a once prosperous American city through art. (Also at their core: regional philanthropists funding that mission.) 
    The scope of these shows tends to be both local and national, though they’re often criticized for a lopsided emphasis on the latter. It’s a fair question to ask, why exhibitions like these are so often organized by people who don’t live in the city they seek to transform. Even the cyclical exhibition format itself seems too episodic to provoke meaningful change. Cynics might see the whole exercise as a form of cultural imperialism.
    But to draw comparisons between this recurring exhibition and other events like it requires one to paint with broad strokes, and Counterpublic doesn’t do broad strokes. The name “Counterpublic,” McAnally explained, suggests multiple different civic groups that are collectively defined only by their opposition to the dominant culture. Recurring art events, like the cities and neighborhoods they occupy, require micro, not macro, engagement.   
    Counterpublic takes place every three years, but its organizers don’t call it a triennial. (This year’s exhibition was delayed a year because of the pandemic.) Instead, they refer to it as a “civic exhibition” that aims to “reimagine civic infrastructures towards generational change.”  
    The repetition of the word “civic” makes the point clear: this is a show that strives to reflect its home city. “I think a lot of times events like this have a very sort of abstract relationship to audience. They seem designed for the art world. They seem designed to get external attention,” McAnally said. “We are doing this for our neighbors first,” he continued. “If we can get it right for our neighbors, we believe we can get it right for the art world.” 
    Anna Tsouhlarakis, The Native Guide Project: STL (2023). Photo: Chris Bauer. Courtesy of Counterpublic.
    Back in 2021, McAnally’s team arranged meetings with community members and partnering organizations to hear what they hoped the next edition of Counterpublic would accomplish. What the locals wanted, McAnally recalled, was for homegrown stories to be told “in public and in a durational way.” The Osage Nation, a tribe displaced by St. Louis’s founding European colonizers, expressed a desire for visibility.  
    At the same time, Counterpublic’s curators were wrestling with St. Louis’s own history of displacement. New Red Order endeavored, in its members’ own words, to “make erasure visible” and present work that didn’t “occupy.” Others sought to resist typical biennial fare, particularly large-scale public sculptures and monuments. Puleo said they wanted to avoid work that “just goes plop.” 
    In other words, at the core of Counterpublic 2023 is a series of seemingly competing aims: visibility, but not occupation; durationality, but not permanence; accessibility, but with a rigorous historical consciousness. How the curators operated within this framework varied significantly; so did the projects they organized.  
    Vij helped virgil b/g taylor produce a series of zines (“Confluence Decree”) about St. Louis’s sewer system, and worked with Steffani Jemison, who created an installation and sound piece that were inspired by Josephine Baker, the first Black woman to star in a major motion picture. Reynolds, meanwhile, tapped the choreographer Will Rawls to create a stop motion film with four channels, each of which is screened at different Jefferson-adjacent sites. One is at a McDonald’s; another is at a costume store called Johnnie Brock’s Dungeon Party Warehouse.  
    McAnally also curated several projects, most notably an immersive architectural and sonic installation by Torkwase Dyson. The work, which covers hundreds of square feet in St. Louis Place Park, takes the form of a constructed amphitheater, replete with benches, stools, and various apertures that reframe the surrounding neighborhood. From several embedded speakers plays a recording that mixes the music of ragtime pioneer—and St. Louis transplant—Scott Joplin with Dyson’s own interpretation of his signature mashup of classical piano and African polyrhythms. According to Counterpublic’s catalogue, Dyson wanted “to make direct correlations between syncopation and the body to explore the spatial impact of present-day climate migrations, displacement, and nomadicity.” 
    Dyson’s work, called Bird and Lava (Scott Joplin), is huge, but not immutable. The structure’s modularity encourages different configurations and the whole thing is put together without nails or screws, making it adaptable to different environments. It’s a real achievement—the work of an artist in full control of her own visual language. 
    Torkwase Dyson, Bird and Lava (Scott Joplin), 2023. Photo: Chris Bauer. Courtesy of Counterpublic.
    Puleo, for her part, opted to pursue presentations that were subtle, ephemeral, and—in some cases—completely invisible. Among the projects organized by the curator are a reimagined state map painted by Jaune Quick-to-See Smith; an augmented reality piece by Cannupa Hanska Luger; and a performance by the Pulitzer Prize-winning composer Ravon Chacon that subdivides the twelve-note Western musical scale into 13 divisions. 
    Puleo worked near, but not on, Sugarloaf Mound, the last intact Native American mound and the oldest human-made structure in St. Louis. Upon joining Counterpublic 2023, the curator wrote to the Osage Nation, which owns the mound, asking permission to include it in the show. She and New Red Order are also working to have the rest of the mound’s land repatriated to the tribe. Looming over the site is a billboard that reads, in no uncertain terms: “Got land? Give it back!”  
    Puleo also assisted artist jackie sumell in repatriating bricks that were produced in St. Louis, then later extracted from Black communities and sold down-river to build plantation-revival-style homes in New Orleans. “Think about all of the enslaved, fugitive people who made their way up to St. Louis, established a thriving black community in the early part of the century, then were systematically disenfranchised,” said Puleo. “Literally, the bricks from their houses were sold… along the same pathways through which they escaped confinement.” 
    sumell buried the bricks somewhere in St. Louis, but she won’t reveal where. “It might not be seen, but I hope that it is felt,” Puleo said of the work. 
    New Red Order, Give it Back: Stage Theory (2023). Courtesy of Counterpublic.
    If Sugarloaf Mound represents one end of Counterpublic, the neighborhood of St. Louis Place represents the other. Located there is the Griot Museum of Black History, a cultural venue that bears little resemblance to those of the institutional art world. Dusty and drab (albeit charmingly so), the museum charts a subjective history of Black life in America, its many installations centered around life-sized wax figures of people like Miles Davis, Elizabeth Keckley, and Dred and Harriet Scott.  
    The Griot will also soon be the site of something else: the first public artwork by David Adjaye. In the museum’s courtyard, the architect-cum-artist is working to erect a version of his “Asaase” series of sculptures, made up of curved, overlapping barriers inspired by the earth-based architecture of West Africa. Built from rammed earth, Adjaye’s work is big and physical; it will outlast anyone alive to see it made. Compared to Counterpublic’s other, more transitory projects, the sculpture is conventional in its material approach. But the power of the piece also comes through its permanence.  
    Well, not all its power. More than his sculpture, what Adjaye has really given the Griot is his name. For the museum, a modest cultural destination that few outside of St. Louis have ever heard of, the association will have a truly transformative effect. For the museum, this is art that is needed now and next.
    That fact wasn’t lost on Adjaye. “It’s a device,” he said of his sculpture during Counterpublic’s opening weekend. He was speaking with Glenn in a panel discussion held in the Griot’s stuffed, carpeted basement. (The building used to be an elementary school, and it shows.) “It’s a trojan horse to invite you to come and be here and engage with this community and engage with this place.” 
    Counterpublic 2023 is on view in St. Louis through July 15.
    Follow Artnet News on Facebook: Want to stay ahead of the art world? Subscribe to our newsletter to get the breaking news, eye-opening interviews, and incisive critical takes that drive the conversation forward. More

  • in

    See the Outfits Worn by Tina Turner, Marilyn Monroe, and Other Legendary ‘Divas’ Going on View in a Splashy Costume Show at the V&A

    Iconic outfits worn by Whitney Houston, Tina Turner, and other “divas” will star in a new exhibition at London’s Victoria and Albert Museum (V&A) this summer.
    The show, simply titled “Diva,” celebrates era-defining performers and the various looks they donned in their heydays. Some 250 objects, including dresses, accessories, and photos, will go on display; many have never been shown in public before. 
    Billed as the first of its kind, the exhibition is set to go on view June 24 through April of next year.  
    “Today the word ‘diva’ holds a myriad of meanings,” said V&A curator Kate Bailey, who organized the show. “At the heart of this exhibition is a story of iconic performers who with creativity, courage, and ambition have challenged the status quo and used their voice and their art to redefine and reclaim the diva.” 
    “Diva” will be divided into two “acts.” The first explores the historical context into which the modern concept of the diva was born. Honored here are opera singers like Adelina Patti and Jenny Lind; silent film sirens such as Clara Bow and Mary Pickford; and actors from Hollywood’s Golden Age, including Vivien Leigh and Mae West. Marilyn Monroe, who fits into the latter category, will be represented by the fringed black dress she wore as Sugar “Kane” Kowalczyk in 1959’s Some Like it Hot. 
    Photograph of Maria Callas in Verdi’s opera La Traviata at the Royal Opera House, Covent Garden, 1958. Photo: Houston Rogers. © Victoria and Albert Museum, London.
    The second act looks at how more contemporary stars have reclaimed the title of “diva” in recent years, often in the face of their own male-dominated industries. Jazz greats Billie Holliday and Ella Fitzgerald make appearances, as do politically minded performers like Nina Simone and Aretha Franklin, while Grace Jones, Prince, Bjork, and Rihanna represent the late 20th and early 21st centuries. 
    Included in this section is Edith Piaf’s famed “little black dress” of the 1950s; the powdered wig and train worn by Elton John for his 50th birthday; and the “Vulva pants” designed for Janelle Monae’s 2018 Pynk music video. 
    “It is wonderful to see the divas celebrated in this exhibition, and to see the V&A reclaiming the title,” said Dame Shirley Bassey, whose Julien MacDonald-designed pink gown that she wore on stage at Glastonbury in 2007 is included in the show.  
    “To me,” Bassey went on, “‘diva’ is all about the power of the voice and the ability to entertain, to succeed against odds, to fight, and break through barrier after barrier: to have your voice heard.” 
    See more material from “Diva” below. 
    Lizzo is seen in midtown New York on September 25, 2021. Photo: Gotham/GC Images.
    Costume, designed by Christian Dior, worn by Vivien Leigh as Paola in Jean Giraudoux’s play Duel of Angels, 1958. © Victoria and Albert Museum, London.
    Tina Turner, performing live onstage c.1979. Photo: Gai Terrell/Redferns.
    Elton John’s 50th birthday look with wig and boat hat, designed by Sandy Powell, 1997. © Victoria and Albert Museum, London.
    Photograph of Theda Bara as Cleopatra in the 1917 film Cleopatra. Photograph: ScreenProd / Photononstop / Alamy Stock Photo.
    Follow Artnet News on Facebook: Want to stay ahead of the art world? Subscribe to our newsletter to get the breaking news, eye-opening interviews, and incisive critical takes that drive the conversation forward. More

  • in

    ‘Her Authenticity Is an Inspiration’: Why Alice Neel’s Soulful Portraits Have Found New Resonance With Artists and Audiences Today

    In Georgie Arce, No.2 (1955), a painting by the Pennsylvania-born artist Alice Neel, a young Puerto Rican boy sits on a dining chair wearing a striped shirt and a large medallion. He holds a toy knife and, with furrowed brows, returns the viewer’s gaze. Neel painted and drew her neighbor, Georgie, starting from around ten years old, many times throughout the 1950s, inadvertently documenting his growth from a child to a teenager. Neel and Georgie both lived in Spanish Harlem, a heavily multicultural part of New York, where the artist resided from 1938 to 1962. 
    “For me, people come first,” journalist Mike Gold quotes Neel saying in 1950 in The Daily Workers, a newspaper published by the Communist Party USA. After a chance encounter, Georgie and Neel became friends for around three decades until Georgie was imprisoned for a double murder in 1974. “I have tried to assert the dignity and eternal importance of the human being in my portraits,” Neel added. Her painting of Georgie is on view in “Alice Neel: Hot Off the Griddle,” the most extensive U.K. retrospective of Neel’s work to date, at the Barbican Centre in London until May 21.
    Neel–who died almost four decades ago at 84 years old—was relatively unknown for most of her life, but the vulnerability of her portrayals has made the artist into a household name across the globe today. There have been multiple major exhibitions on the artist’s work over the last few years, including at the Metropolitan Museum of Art in New York in 2021 and last year at the Centre Pompidou in Paris, the Guggenheim in Bilbao and the de Young Museum in San Francisco. She has also inspired many prominent artists alive today, including Amy Sherald, Wangari Mathenge, and Chantal Joffe. “Neel captures the soul of her subjects,” Sherald said. “Her authenticity is an inspiration.” 
    Even with Georgie’s determined stare, tight posture, and the way he firmly wields his ‘weapon,’ there is a tenderness to Neel’s portrait. “It feels like we see a boy who’s yearning to be a young man but who still cowers under his own childhood as well,” Eleanor Nairne, curator of the Barbican show, said. “You see that in many of Neel’s adult portraits, too,” Nairne added. “That sense of how we as people are often reaching for something but also intimidated by that thing we are reaching for.”
    Alice Neel, Geoffrey Hendricks and Brian (1978). ©The Estate of Alice Neel. Courtesy The Estate of Alice Neel.
    According to Emma Baker, head of contemporary evening sales at Sotheby’s, part of what has also enticed contemporary viewers and buyers to Neel’s paintings is the artist’s social consciousness, and how her portraits anticipated many issues that have only in recent years come to the forefront of mainstream conversations. It has been widely reported that Georgie’s incarceration was a result of the chaos, violence and underfunded system he grew up with. “She was very much attuned to what was going on socially and politically and translating that through the subjects that she chose to depict,” Baker said.
    For some, Neel’s depictions of the boy can be seen as a sense of foreboding, from the cheerful little character seen standing with his leg pressed up against the chair in a painting from 1953 to the more pensive personality that comes later. But, for others, like the rest of Neel’s oeuvre, each portrait of Georgie shows the multidimensionality of being human—Neel provides an honest illustration of his innocence, hopes, struggles, and joy, all perfectly entwined. “Part of what I find so compelling about looking at her work is how they don’t calcify into a single fixed image of a person,” Nairne said. “They have some sense of multiplicity in them because we are all, as people, multiple.” 
    Beyond Georgie, Neel’s extensive oeuvre not only depicts her friends and family but also marginalized people in New York, including nude pregnant women, who often weren’t found in dignified portraits, part of which has made her into a feminist icon today, though she may not have agreed with being pigeonholed as one. “She painted everyone: people of colour, the elderly, the poor, and gay and transgender people, and persevered through a time when figuration was renounced,” artist Amy Sherald said.
    Alice Neel, Pregnant Julie and Algis (1967). ©The Estate of Alice Neel . Courtesy The Estate of Alice Neel.
    Neel actively went against the grain of her time, which included disregarding Abstract Expressionism during the 1940s and ‘50s, Pop art during the 1960s, and Minimalism. Consequently, she struggled financially. From 1933, she received a small sum to produce pieces as part of the Public Works of Art Project (replaced by the Works Project Administration created by President Franklin D. Roosevelt in 1934), a program that employed artists to create works for public buildings and parks during the Great Depression. “It wasn’t a very big income, but it gave me enough to live and paint on,” Neel told the American art historian Cindy Nemser for the book Art Talk: conversations with 12 women artists, published in 1975. In 1943 when the payments ended, she immediately went on welfare until the 1950s, bringing up her children on a tight budget. They managed to live a “nice lifestyle” nonetheless, Neel’s son Hartley told a journalist after her death. “The only reason it was sensitive is that something is embarrassing about being on welfare,” he said. “It’s a certain stigma associated to that.” 
    Over the last two decades, “we’ve seen a real return to figuration for many artists,” Nairne said. Who has been and is being represented, and how, has also been a topic brought to the fore, especially with movements such as #MeToo and Black Lives Matter. “It’s interesting to look back to who some of those historical figures were during the 20th century who became important role models or influences on those artists.” 
    Sticking with these portraits for so long shows that Neel knew that one day society would value these sorts of paintings and understand the power that portraiture holds to spark conversations around social issues. “She’s a testament to the idea of perseverance, Sotheby’s Baker said, “and to having faith and commitment and belief in what you’re doing.” 
    “Alice Neel: Hot off the Griddle” is on view through May 21 at Barbican Art Gallery. The accompanying book Alice Neel: Hot Off The Griddle, edited by Eleanor Nairne, with essays by Eleanor Nairne, Hilton Als and poetry by Daisy Lafarge, is published by Prestel, March 2023.
    Follow Artnet News on Facebook: Want to stay ahead of the art world? Subscribe to our newsletter to get the breaking news, eye-opening interviews, and incisive critical takes that drive the conversation forward. More

  • in

    Artists Petrit Halilaj and Álvaro Urbano Have Filled a 9th-Century Venetian Church With a Fantastical Menagerie—Crowned by a Giant Floating Egg

    A wondrous new universe is emerging inside of an ancient church—courtesy of the artists Petrit Halilaj and Álvaro Urbano. The duo has rendered an entire hybrid animal kingdom in a menagerie of sculptures—just one component of the new installation that was unveiled today in Venice, Italy.
    The Saint Lorenzo church is the locale for Lunar Ensemble for Uprising Seas, a speculative ecosystem that blends art with mythology, sci-fi, and history. This grandiose piece, which is an entire multimedia sensory experience, is up until November 3, and the artists have packed many narratives (and genres!) within.
    Installation view of ‘Lunar Ensemble for Uprising Seas.’ Courtesy of the artists, TBA21—Academy and Audemars Piguet.
    On one side of the church, a majestic and serene egg hangs suspended, seemingly floating above, presiding like a celestial body. A world of fantastical animals is here too, with 30 sculptures that embody aquatic, terrestrial, and avian qualities. These creatures’ metallic surfaces reflect light, pulling in the sublime interior of the deconsecrated house of worship. Each artwork also doubles as a musical instrument—human interaction triggers music boxes and other aural mechanisms.
    Installation view of ‘Lunar Ensemble for Uprising Seas.’ Courtesy of the artists, TBA21—Academy and Audemars Piguet.
    The Berlin-based pair Halilaj and Urbano are a couple but rarely work together. The work explores the space between realities and societal norms, as well as raising many environmental concerns. The Spanish traditional song “Ay mi pescadito” was the jump-off for their creation. They explained in an artist’s statement: “The work blurs our binary sense of the world. An egg-shaped moon, aquatic creatures becoming terrestrial and aerial, an orchestra playing a symphony that emerges from the waters and syncs with the moon cycles; these and more stories guide our show at Ocean Space. The installation echoes a children’s song, where young fish go to school at the bottom of the sea in order to study forms of resistance.”
    Petrit Halilaj and Álvaro Urbano. Courtesy of the artists.
    Throughout the piece’s installation, various musicians and performers will be on hand to activate the sculptures’ musical potential. There will also be seagull costumes to let the attendees become animals and merge with the piece. The artists will don the gull costumes at two performances.
    The installation is on view with free admission and is one of two works that comprise “Thus waves come in pairs,” Ocean Space’s 2023 exhibition. “Lunar Ensemble for Uprising Seas” is a co-commission between TBA21–Academy and Audemars Piguet Contemporary.
    Lunar Ensemble for Uprising Seas is on view Wednesday–Sunday, 11 a.m.–6 p.m. at Ocean Space Chiesa di San Lorenzo Castello 5069 30122 Venice

    Follow Artnet News on Facebook:

    Want to stay ahead of the art world? Subscribe to our newsletter to get the breaking news, eye-opening interviews, and incisive critical takes that drive the conversation forward. More

  • in

    “The Olympic Ring between Apollo and Daphne” by OZMO in Paris, France

    OZMO, on the occasion of the Planète Périphérique Festival, the project organized by the RAS association and realized with the support of RIVP and the Mairie du 20eme,  had the opportunity to create an artistic intervention that develops on the exterior walls of an entire building located in the heart of the Python-Duvernois district, in Porte de Bagnolet, in the 20th arrondissement of Paris.The context and the formal features of the building inspired him for this project: it is impossible to think of painting on the main facade, full of balconies, windows and pillars, so he tried to find a solution that would make these elements become an integral part of the main subject: a huge, fiery red ring.For  The Olympic Ring between Apollo and Daphne   – this is the title of the work I made –  he then recontextualized Apollo chasing Daphne and Daphne chased by Apollo, the statues that the brothers Nicolas and Guillaume Coustou created for the park of the castle of Marly and that from 1940 are in the Louvre.The statues, designed and arranged so as to make a parallel run, are now depicted on the ends of the palace, one on each of the blind side walls, as directed in the opposite direction. They are reached and wrapped by the large red ring, shaded like a neon sign, overlooking the facade.This element, the real protagonist of the intervention, which unfolds along the two suspenders that join the balconies, is a reference to the busy périférique, the Parisian ring road, on which the intervention faces? Is that an answer to the huge advertising signs on the building across the street? Or is that a fil rouge? Does it evoke a track, a path or an orbit? And what possible link does it have to the red ring of the Olympics citeThe Olympic Ring between Apollo and Daphne offers itself to the passerby as an element of short-circuit and harmonization: between the two mythological figures, between the walls of the building, between the idea of the center and the suburbs, and between our perception of street art, graffiti and ancient and contemporary art in the urban context.The Intervention was presented on 13 April during the vernissage of the Planète Périphérique Festival, the extraordinary event that involved about one hundred artists who have created painted installations and interventions in the 3000 m2 of 21 apartments. The collective exhibition will be open until 7 May 2023. More

  • in

    ‘Juxtaposition Is the Art of the Possible’: Taking a Turn as a Curator, Artist David Salle Considers How Context Shapes the Way We See Art

    For a show opening at the Hill Art Foundation in New York on April 21, the artist David Salle has curated a selection of paintings and sculptures by 35 artists. Drawing on history-spanning works by the likes of Peter Paul Rubens, Francis Bacon, Salman Toor, and Cecily Brown, “Beautiful, Vivid, Self-contained” considers the role of juxtaposition in our experience of art. Below, read an excerpt from the essay Salle wrote for the show’s catalogue.

    The purpose of this exhibition is to consider the nature of affinity in painting. What perceptions about painting—from the inside out—bind diverse works together?
    How can works of art be said to influence one another? How does aesthetic DNA become encoded in a painting; how is it passed on, and in what form?
    What constitutes this influence? How to separate fashion, obvious and transitory, from the mysterious seeding of ideas that disperse like a dandelion puff in the wind?
    Are there pictorial inventions that jump across historical divides to be reimagined in a wholly different time and place?
    Is there such a thing as “aesthetic personality,” and can it be recognized in another context? Can a painting be said to have a nervous system? What is the psychic mapping that undergirds a pictorial attitude?
    Perhaps the thorniest question of all: What is the relationship between intention and style, and is it quantifiable? Can artists of different styles—different surface attributes—have a similar relationship to their intention?
    David Salle, Pavane (1990). © 2023 David Salle / VAGA at Artists Rights Society (ARS), New York. Courtesy of Skarstedt, New York.
    In a lengthy essay published in the New Yorker in 2007, novelist Milan Kundera discusses the nature of accepted context versus actual influence. He surprises us with the claim that he does not wish to be characterized as an Eastern European writer. It may seem counterintuitive in our current identitarian age, but Kundera doesn’t want to be a “Czech writer.” (He even chafes at being compared to Franz Kafka.) For Kundera, the whole notion of national identity as a literary category is wrong.
    [I]f we consider the history of the novel, it was to Rabelais that Laurence Sterne was reacting, it was Sterne who set off Diderot, it was from Cervantes that Fielding drew inspiration, it was against Fielding that Stendhal measured himself, it was Flaubert living on in Joyce, it was through Joyce that Herman Broch developed his own poetics of the novel, and it was Kafka who showed García Márquez the possibility to “write another way.”
    How does aesthetic transference happen? Let’s pose the question in different terms. Two renowned composers on what they value, or don’t, in the work of earlier artists:
    I don’t believe at all in the distinction between tonal and atonal music. I think the way to understand these things is that they are the result of magnetic forces between the notes, which creates a magnetic tension, an attraction or repulsion. —Thomas Adès
    It’s not so much how [Beethoven] gets into things that’s interesting, it’s how he gets out of them. — Morton Feldman
    There are many different ways to group paintings; the categories most often used don’t have much to do with a work’s “inside energy.” The presumed affiliations that are readily accessed are: generation (the new painters) or geography (new painting in Canada); appearance, or “style”; technology; or demographics, otherwise known as identity. Now, only a fool would say that context doesn’t matter. Of course, the time and place and the circumstances in which something was made matter greatly—they are in a way the markers of what is conceivable. But they fail to give an account of why certain things hold our attention, or why they affect us as they do. A painting is more than the sum of its parts. It is the way in which those parts are put together that moves us, even if we’re not aware of that dimension.
    Anthropomorphizing paintings, projecting onto them the behavioral complexities that one might apply to people, may seem a kind of lunacy, but I’m willing to go out on a limb. Pictures are all equally self-evident; nothing is hidden. Whatever happens in a painting takes place, almost by definition, on the surface. How then can we say of a painting that it is obscure or enigmatic? Perhaps it’s a matter of timing. There are objects that by design reveal themselves to us all at once, and there are paintings whose stories unfold gradually, bit by atonal bit.
    Cecily Brown, The use of blue in vertigo (2022). © Cecily Brown. Courtesy of Paula Cooper Gallery, New York. Photo: Genevieve Hanson.
    Thomas Adès again, on the power of juxtaposition: “A thing becomes possible which makes another thing possible, which wouldn’t have been possible without it.”
    The essential thing: Juxtaposition is the art of the possible. Visual art also adheres to Chekhov’s famous dramatic imperative: If there is a gun in the first act it must go off in the last. Certain things in a painting lay out the conditions for other things to occur. A painting can “import” elements from far away, from different aesthetic universes, if the painting itself has established a sufficiently elastic context. That which was previously impossible now begets the possible. The ways in which that is accomplished are myriad and unpredictable. For the time being, stretchy is good. Stretchy is how we live now. What we want is a stretchy Haggadah.
    Can the works in this exhibition be said to speak to each other? What is the common language? Even if everything is a cultural construct, how one operates within that construct is the point of distinction.
    To take just one example from our show, consider the way Charline von Heyl lays the structural groundwork in her painting for the unexpected; a surprising yet seemingly inevitable conflict between different pictorial conceptions, like the last act of our drama. This thing—this image, this mark, this color or shape, this interval—requires that thing (the fire burns the stick, the water puts out the fire). Creating that sense of inevitability is the art. This is not merely formalism—it’s the poetics of dynamism. Painting events are like notes in a melody, one note following another in specific intervals of both sound and time. An atonal sequence of notes, though unlikely to strike us as melodic, can still have wrong notes. How can you tell? Even an infant can recognize nonsense words when it hears them. A six-week-old baby (if born to English speakers) will recognize that “pilk” is not a word. There is a similar mechanism in painting, with the mind-bending difference that it is the artist herself who must make the grammatical rules, and also demonstrate in the painting how the rules are true. To make things even more complicated, not all “rules” are equally productive, and not all applications of those rules are equally meaningful.
    The paintings in this exhibition, together with the sculptures, provide an occasion to consider the nature of aesthetic grammar and syntax, and to note the adherence to similar or overlapping grammatical rules. It’s not just that something looks like something else; it’s a question of how each picture establishes its own notion of the uses of painting grammar. It is in the complex nature of painting: The artist’s relationship to that grammar is the wellspring of their distinction.

    Follow Artnet News on Facebook: Want to stay ahead of the art world? Subscribe to our newsletter to get the breaking news, eye-opening interviews, and incisive critical takes that drive the conversation forward. More