More stories

  • in

    Registrations open for 2021 NGV Architecture Commission competition

    The National Gallery of Victoria’s Architecture Commission is returning in 2021 and registrations of interest are now open for the competition to design an installation within the gallery’s Grollo Equiset Garden.
    The 2021 iteration will be the sixth commission, following on from the 2019’s In Absence, designed by Yhonnie Scarce and Edition Office.
    The two-stage design competition is open to architects or multidisciplinary teams that include registered architect.

    Teams can include various design and broader creative disciplines “to propose a project that explores new terrain for an architecture commission – from a conceptual, material, experiential or formal sense.”
    The 2021 NGV Architecture Commission Jury comprises: Tony Ellwood (NGV director); Ewan McEoin (NGV senior curator of contemporary design and architecture);Sophie Rzepecky (Assemble Papers editor); Felicity Stewart (Stewart Architecture director); Louise Wright (Baracco and Wright Architects co-diretor).

    “Since 2015 this series has moved in unanticipated and exciting directions, a direct result of the breadth of ideas fielded in the open competition process and the vigorous efforts of the competition juries over the years to avoid a preconceived notion of what the commission ‘should be’ and instead support the strongest ideas through the competition process,” said Tony Ellwood. “We encourage teams – established and emerging, large and small – and across broad disciplines to make the time this year to engage with each other and embrace this opportunity”
    Registrations will be open until 6 November and stage one starts on 12 October. Registrations for the design competition can be made via the NGV website..

    Related topics More

  • in

    Australian projects shortlisted in Architectural Review House Awards

    The UK’s Architectural Review has announced the shortlist for its AR House Awards. Two Australian houses are among the 15 shortlisted projects.
    Daylesford Longhouse by Partners Hill is one Australian shortlisted project. The house also won the 2019 Australian House of the Year and the 2019 Robin Boyd Award for Residential Architecture – Houses (New).
    The building contains a home, a cooking school and a working farm, all housed within a 110 metre long shed.
    “This is a masterful building that is clearly designed by an architect who has rehearsed the spatial sequencing puzzle of residential architecture many times,” writes Katelin Butler in a review.

    Couldrey House by Australian architect Peter Besley and London studio HNNA is also shortlisted. Located in Bardon, Queensland, the house sits at the foothills of Mount Coot-tha. The house is characterized by a textured façade, made from think, long bricks with mortar spilling out of the joints, which give the appearance of corduroy.

    The 2020 AR House Awards are judged by Anna Chavepayre (co-founder of Collectif Encore), Lisa Shell (founder of Lisa Shell Architects), and Ard de Vries (founder of Ard de Vries Architecten), all of whom have had projects shortlisted or commended in the awards in previous years.
    The judges are looking for “ingenious and pioneering houses that seek to push the type forward.”
    The winners and commended projects will be announced at the end of November.

    Related topics More

  • in

    Interview series celebrates World Architecture Day

    In celebration of World Architecture Day, Australian architectural hardware company Novas and are launching an interview series with four prominent architects.
    Beginning on 5 October, with a new interview released every Monday of the month, the series will ask “why architecture matters,” particular in the context of climate change, COVID-19 and the economic recession.
    ArchitectureAU editor Linda Cheng will be conducting the one-on-one interviews. Sydney architect Koichi Takada will be first of the mark, followed by Perth architects Fariborz Hatam and David Hillam and Melbourne architect Callum Fraser.

    Koichi Takada is known for his focus on greening and naturalizing architecture, particularly in urban environments. His firm’s projects include the Sydney towers project Arc, the National Museum of Qatar Gift Shops and a forthcoming 1000-tree tower in South Brisbane.

    A former design director at Aedas, Fariborz Hatam has experience working across Australia, Croatia, Afghanistan, India, Georgia, Iran, Qatar, Jordan, Saudi Arabia and the UAE.
    David Hillam, of Hillam Architects, is known for his high-quality multi residential designs, including the recently completed the recently completed Botanical apartment building, which won a number of awards.
    Callum Fraser co-founded Melbourne firm Elenberg Fraser in 1998, and has helped build it into a successful, award-winning practice. Projects include Vue de Monde, Zumbo Melbourne and A’Beckett Tower.
    The first interview with Koichi Takada begins at 12.30 pm on 5 October. To register to watch the interviews, head here.
    ArchitectureAU.com is the media partner for this series. More

  • in

    Terracotta lattice tower proposed for Brisbane

    Fender Katsalidis has designed a 22-storey office tower for a corner site in central Brisbane that will feature an open ground plane.
    Located at the intersection of Mary Street and Edward Street, the 133 Mary Street tower will sit along a key pedestrian thoroughfare, near the new Albert Street Station a block away and the Eagle Street Pier ferry terminal.
    The design of the building provides an open, landscaped space which will be accessible to the public and widens streetscape view lines.

    “At the important lower levels that are more immediately viewed and experienced by those walking along the streets, the proposed façade expression is one of heightened richness in materiality,” state the architects in planning documents. “This richness tapers to a more abstracted form in the upper levels of the building where the building is predominantly perceived in more distant views and relates more to the broader urban fabric.”

    View gallery

    133 Mary Street by Fender Katsalidis.

    The building’s façade will be made with terracotta in reference the historical fabric of the city, and in particular the Edward Street streetscape, where terracotta is a common material.
    Inspired by the typical brise soliel of the tropics, the design includes a terracotta lattice to sculpt the open volume in between the building proper and the street.
    “From the open ground plane, the geometric terracotta framework extends up the building embracing the tower with its intricately crafted latticework,” the architects say. “As it rises, this lattice transforms into a more open expression, becoming a delicate glass tower with lush green balconies.”
    Lat 27 is the landscape architect for the project, responsible for the subtropical planting and foliage running from the ground level to the sky terraces, inspired by the nearby City Botanical Gardens precinct.
    In addition to the office levels, there will be a rooftop terrace on level 22 complete with a bar and function space and a cafe on the ground level.
    A development application submitted by developer ARA Private Funds is currently before council. More

  • in

    Social housing and bicycle infrastructure win in Dulux Colour Awards

    A utilitarian end-of-trip facility enlivened with fourteen different colours has won the Australian Grand Prix in the 2020 Dulux Colour Awards.
    Searle Waldron Architecture took home the top prize for its University of Melbourne Southbank End of Trip project. The New Zealand Grand Prix went to Rohan Collett Architect for Social Housing Development Rangiora, a genre-busting project defined by “purposeful irregularity.”
    “We are usually spoiled with extraordinarily creative colour use in private and commercial applications, but to see that same level of ambition and execution in public works signifies an increased recognition of the universal role colour can play in spatial experiences,” said the judges.

    Now in its 34th year, the Dulux Colour Awards program recognizes the most cutting-edge and creative applications of colour in Australia and New Zealand across six categories of architecture and design. This year’s awards attracted more than 450 entries across both countries.

    “The level of sophistication, creativity and masterful use of colour continues to rise each year,” said Dulux colour and communications manager Andrea Lucena-Orr. “Architects and designers are becoming increasingly bold and adept at employing paint as an integral element in the design of both internal and external spaces and this is evident across all the winning projects.”
    The winners are:
    Grand Prix Australia winner and Commercial and Multi-residential Exterior winner
    University of Melbourne Southbank – End of Trip – Searle Waldron Architecture
    Judges’ comments: “Ambitious in its conception and labour intensive in its realisation, this project stood out from the start. As an end-of-trip destination with bike storage and changerooms, its program is utilitarian, yet the architects approached it as an opportunity for broader engagement with the surrounding elements. It is a credit to them that they conceived of such a complex palette, comprising no less than 14 Dulux hues, and executed it so successfully. The random, pixelated effect of the thousands of painted battens is intricate like a woven textile, ever- changing under different light conditions. It draws one into the space and, as the architects state, “affirms its specific civic arts identity through creativity and colour”. We are in awe of the outcome.”
    Grand Prix New Zealand winner

    View gallery

    Social Housing Development Rangiora by Rohan Collett Architect.
    Image: Lightforge – Dennis Radermacher
    Social Housing Development Rangiora – Rohan Collett Architect
    Judges’ comments: “The uniformity and blandness that plagues much of the social-housing genre has been cleverly avoided in this highly considered multi-residential project for individuals over 55. With colour as a key tool, individual homes have been given unique identities while still visually integrating into the surrounding area as a whole. Colour has also been employed as a navigational device across the site. But it is the fine balance between cohesion and what the architect describes as “purposeful irregularity” in the application of the palette across the 28 units that is to be commended; there is just enough similarity in the hues of the facades for the village to identify as a whole and, on the flip side, just enough individuality for it not to slip into bland uniformity. This is a genre-busting project, worthy of high praise.”
    The project also received a commendation in the Commercial and Multi-residential Exterior category.
    Single Residential Interior

    View gallery

    Perfect Storm by Green Anvil Co, Killing Matt Woods and Set for Art.
    Image: Katherine Lu
    Winner
    Perfect Storm – Green Anvil Co, Killing Matt Woods and Set for Art

    Judges’ comments: “Avoiding the ubiquitous industrial cliché, this warehouse renovation is instead a Brutalist– inspired marvel. Its minimalism and clean, clutter-free aesthetic signals a commitment to the vision by both the clients and their design team. The use of a single colour and finish, with the appearance of concrete, on all painted surfaces has a surprisingly warm cocooning effect, which is amplified by the soft curve where walls meet ceilings. It is utilitarian chic at its best – intimate, moody, balanced – and awarded for its simplicity and singularity.”
    Commendation
    Ruckers Hill House – Studio Bright
    Single Residential Exterior

    View gallery

    Casuarina House by Vokes and Peters
    Image: Christopher Frederick Jones
    Winner
    Casuarina House – Vokes and Peters

    Judges’ comments: “Impactful in its simplicity, this new family home responds to its coastal setting by promoting an outdoor lifestyle and facilitating an easy flow between inside and out. Its Capsicum Red-painted external timbers and the sandy brickwork and masonry elements are perfectly balanced and contrast strikingly with the native foliage. Described by the architects as bright and defiantly modern when hit by the direct sun, the statement red exterior becomes subdued and moody when shaded, transforming the architectural expression from day to night. Overall, this is a bold design of unwavering commitment that exudes warmth and depth through colour and texture.”
    Commendation
    Split House – Pac Studio

    Commercial Interior: Workplace and Retail

    View gallery

    Armitage Jones by Bergman and Co.
    Image: Nicole England
    Winner
    Armitage Jones – Bergman and Co
    Judges’ comments: “Barely recognisable as a workplace and more akin to a contemporary hospitality venue, this highly refined ‘office’ space is a typological hybrid in which colour plays the pivotal role. Spilling over surfaces and paired with materials, colour saturates every space, delineating zones and creating distinct moods. The red seating pod, where the carpet is matched to the paint, is one example of this execution. Underpinning the entire scheme is a cool grey that is key to the strategy’s success; if it were another colour, the space wouldn’t have the same feeling. It takes on different appearances where it adjoins the accent colours of muddy burgundy and muted gold, yet gently dominates and draws one into the areas where it has been uniformly adopted.”
    Commendation
    Adam Kane Architects Office – Adam Kane Architects
    Commercial Interior: Public and Hospitality

    View gallery

    Arts Epicentre by Branch Studio Architects.
    Image: Peter Clarke
    Winner
    Arts Epicentre – Branch Studio Architects

    Judges’ comments: “The impact and sophistication of this interior set it apart and totally fulfil the architects’ aim to conceive of it more as a public performing arts facility than a school building. Its sculptural elements are striking in themselves, but the accentuation of their curvaceous forms by strong black outlines or full swathes of the hue on structural components like the stairs, is masterful. It appears as though ribbons of black are twisting through the space, orientating and guiding people through it in the most seductive fashion. It is no coincidence that this architectural triumph is a hub for the creative arts – theatre, music, fine art, and so on – for it is nothing short of dramatic.”
    Commendation
    Darebin Arts Centre – Sibling Architecture
    Student

    View gallery

    Ascend by Louise Mackay, Sydney Design School.

    Winner
    Ascend – Louise Mackay, Sydney Design School

    Judges’ comments: “A nod to the Queen Victoria M Pavilion, this free-standing pod incorporates a VR engine designed to simulate colour’s effects on a person. Its reflective blue chromatic exterior sits well with its surroundings while cocooning those within. It is a sophisticated high-tech concept, in which the student has considered the effects of colour across a whole day, and its execution could be quite magical.”

    Commendations
    Hump House – Ying Ho Shiu (Hiro), RMIT
    Queen Victoria Pavilion – Michael Ren, The University of Melbourne More

  • in

    Robin Boyd’s first home heritage status challenged

    The first home designed by Robin Boyd for his family, and one of the earliest known modernist houses constructed in Victoria, is facing a challenge to its heritage status, with a hearing to be held in early 2021 to decide its fate.
    The Former Boyd House at 666 Riversdale Road, Camberwell was built just after World War II (1946–47) and is recognized as an early and influential example of the famous architect’s work. It was classified by the National Trust as a place of state significance in 1987 and added to the Victorian Heritage Register in 1991.

    An application to have it struck off the register was submitted to the Heritage Council of Victoria in 2019. The applicant argues that while the property’s statement of significance describes it as “the earliest known extant residence designed by the renowned Australian architect Robin Boyd,” Boyd had in fact designed an earlier house, built in September 1943, for a Corporal Jones.

    The statement of significance also maintains that the Former Robin Boyd House “is unique in being a house that Boyd designed for his personal use and occupied and extended over a period of twelve years.” The applicant disputes that this makes it unique, since the Walsh Street house designed in 1957 was also built for Boyd’s own family and is a more well-known work.

    Heritage Victoria executive director Steven Avery rejected those claims, however, in a July 2020 recommendation not to remove the house from the register.
    Avery notes that the “Corporal Jones” for whom Boyd designed a house in 1943 was in fact a hypothetical and typical soldier – “our tent-mate Corporal J H Jones,” as described in SALT, the educational journal of the Australian Army and Air Force. Boyd documented a design in that journal for a house that would be suitable for construction on a budget by returned servicemen under the War Services Homes Scheme. It’s not known if any house was built to that plan but, regardless, “If another earlier house designed by Boyd was found, it would not diminish the cultural heritage significance of the Former Robin Boyd House.”

    Similarly, Avery rejects that the existence of the Walsh Street house detracts from the significance of the Former Boyd House in any way.
    “Both buildings are significant for their association with Robin Boyd and their use as homes he designed for his family,” his recommendation notes. “They are also significant as exemplary examples of modernist residential architecture in Victoria.”
    The Heritage Council called for public submissions on the heritage listing between July and 14 September, prompting calls to action from the National Trust and local community groups.
    A spokesperson for Heritage Victoria told ArchitectureAU that a hearing had been requested by the applicant, and that “a Committee of the Heritage Council must now conduct a hearing into the matter to determine whether the place should or should not be removed from the Heritage Register.”
    The hearing will take place in early 2021, on a date to be determined. More

  • in

    Star Casino proposes two towers instead of one at contested Pyrmont site

    The Star Casino has declared it wants to build two towers, of 110 and 180 metres, in Pyrmont at the site of its ill-fated proposal for a 237-metre-tall hotel and residential tower designed by FJMT.
    The casino is banking on the government’s need to boost the construction industry and accelerate the economic recovery to win support for the proposal.
    In a submission made on the draft Pyrmont Peninsula Place Strategy – an overhaul of the area’s planning regulation that will allow for towers of up to 180 metres – Star notes that it has listened to criticism of its earlier tower and developed a proposal that will be “a compelling step forward for Pyrmont and NSW.”

    On the northern section of the site, where the original tower was to be built, the casino wants to build a 110-metre hotel development with a signature restaurant and other food and beverage offerings. The submission notes that the tower would be less than half the height of the original proposal, and almost identical in height to the four 106-metre chimney stacks that once rose from the site as part of the former Pyrmont Power Station.

    To the south of the site, on Union Street, the 180-metre tower would house apartments and another hotel, with retail, a restaurant and bars in the podium.

    A report prepared by Ethos Urban and included in the submission notes that while Star is broadly supportive of the draft place strategy, it takes issue with some detailed principles established in the Urban Design Strategic Framework prepared by Hassell in July 2020.

    In particular, Ethos’s report interrogates the concept of “a stepping down of building heights from the peninsula to the harbour edge” to protect the historic character of the peninsula, claiming that this principle runs counter to the overarching vision of an “innovative, creative and cultural precinct and an engine room of the Harbour CBD.”

    “Put simply, the intersection of these two principles would prevent The Star Sydney from contributing toward the economic optimisation and growth of the area,” the report notes. “We therefore question the balance between the delivery of ‘ridgetop village character’ and the ‘significant renewal [of sites at the] harbour edge’ with the other key design principles established in the Hassell Urban Design Strategic Framework, such as heights stepping down to the water and protecting the amenity of streets and spaces.”

    When the state government released its draft place strategy in July, it raised concerns that the planning overhaul had resurrected the “zombie” casino tower proposal.
    “The Pyrmont Peninsula Place Strategy must not become an exercise in retrofitting controls to justify the Star Casino’s inappropriate tower,” Sydney mayor Clover Moore said at the time.
    In its submission on the draft place strategy, the City of Sydney argues that the key sites identified in the plan – such as The Star Casino – should not be treated as state significant and that the council should retain planning authority over the sites.
    Some 135 submissions were made to the government on its place strategy document during a period of public consultation from 31 July to 13 September. More

  • in

    Architectural tapestry: State Library of Victoria Vision 2020

    The State Library of Victoria (SLV), fronting Melbourne’s Swanston Street, covers an entire city block. Founded in 1854 and opened in 1856, it has a fascinating and complex history, sharing its site, at times, with the institutions now called Museum Victoria and the National Gallery of Victoria. The precinct felt like another world prior to the most recent renovation, which began in 1985. Inside the Domed Reading Room (opened in 19131 ), sparrows and starlings flew around the ceiling. The room’s breathtaking internal streetscape included ghost facades sculpted inside its octagonal drum. A remarkable suite of Edwardian Baroque furniture was lit by rows of feeble bulbs, with students and homeless people alike hunched over desks in constant twilight. To borrow an item, you lined up in the old first-floor catalogue room, full of wooden chests of handwritten cards. Dust-coated men hastened up and down a spiral stair into Piranesian caverns in the stacks, fetching items from cabinets, tables and tallboys.

    Since finances had been frozen in the 1920s and ’30s, the library had spent decades simply trying to survive. Working there gave you a splitting eyestrain headache, except in the one more modern interior that was the La Trobe Library (now the Conference Centre) – a deeply optimistic, rubber-floored, bronze-windowed tribute to Swedish architect Gunnar Asplund. Begun in 1951, it took 14 years and three recessions to complete. In the 1960s and early ’70s, trainee librarians were routinely shown through Australia’s “heartbreak library” – still a tangle of museum, gallery and library, largely spread along hallways. The gallery shifted in 1968 but the museum remained. In 1985, a competition was held in an attempt to rejuvenate the building.2

    A masterplan by Ancher Mortlock Woolley won the competition, and the practice designed most alterations up to 2010. It filled in the block’s unfinished exteriors (two La Trobe street frontages), refitted the museum’s old McCoy Hall (1892) as the Redmond Barry Reading Room, uncloaked and rebuilt the Dome’s skylights (which had been damaged and closed over in 1959) and reshaped the present Cowen Gallery (built in various stages between 1892 and 1941) – now a lively and well-visited space showing off Melbourne and Victoria through the library’s own notable collection. They refitted the catalogue basement (constructed between 1907 and 1913), giving it a touch of Otto Wagner with Dalek air vents, marble panelling and gold studs. The weak point was the corridor and vestibule treatments: mostly dim, dark and indifferent.

    View gallery

    The Swanston Street foyer, refurbished during the Vision 2020 works, was part of the Library’s original 1856 building.
    Image: Brett Boardman
    The Vision 2020 plan (2017–20), funded by the Victorian government and philanthropic donations, supplanted the Ancher Mortlock Woolley masterplan in 2017. In a limited competition, Architectus, with the Danish firm Schmidt Hammer Lassen, was selected to design the redevelopment. With Andronas Conservation Architecture as heritage consultants – building on Lovell Chen’s earlier heritage studies and strategic plan (1985–2012) – the team has completed a comprehensive second-stage refurbishment, revitalizing 15 of the 28 major spaces on the Library’s current map. Its signature is the restored Ian Potter Queen’s Hall, the earliest reading room behind the 1869–70 portico.3 The work also includes the great polished stone stair (1906–13) leading up to the octagonal Reading Room Dome; Hansen Hall (1863–64), between Mr Tulk cafe (1961) and the main entrance; the interstices between the Dome and the squared wings around it; and the Isabella Fraser Room, a function area on the La Trobe Street frontage. The former Trescowthick Information Centre has been reconfigured as the Quad, and the library’s four triangular courtyards (three of which were roofed in the 1990s) have been repurposed.

    The new surfaces gleam as if built yesterday. Several spaces look bare on initial impression: in their new uniformity of colour, Queen’s Hall, Hansen Hall and the genealogy and arts collections appear almost as if waiting for occupancy, waiting for something to happen. But isn’t that what a library should suggest? And its new occupancy is only just unfolding, after all. These interiors leave room for the library to grow into them, visually and in memory. The architects’ work for Vision 2020 is not externally focused, as Ken Woolley’s work had been. Ancher Mortlock Woolley’s internal spaces were clean-ups, with the fitouts strictly framed by the basic structure. Architectus and Schmidt Hammer Lassen Architects has sustained a lighter hand; its refurbishment is more playful and kinetically relaxed, improvising on circumstance, working changes through and around the basic structure.

    The new work gives each new space a distinct narrative character and offers many surprises. One signature motif is timber plank fabric, which never meets the basic wall or roof structures but is set hovering between them – often, as in the Pauline Gandel Children’s Quarter, with varied transparency across its envelope. In sheer presence, the Children’s Quarter, which replaced the 1963 Melbourne Planetarium, recalls Gunnar Asplund’s children’s space at Stockholm Library (1928), though that is a small, apsidal womb and this is a converted courtyard. At SLV, the Children’s Quarter is both a singular, protective realm – despite a high roof – and a terrain of adventure, with curl-up alcoves in a layer literally under the stairs at ground level (four bays) and eyrie-like stages at first-floor level (again, four bays, each with monumental timber canopies). One bay surrounds and celebrates a space-frame column; at the other end, a similar column is left out on its own. In the Quad reading and computer area, the tables, chairs and seat groupings all change form casually around the octagonal space, breaking from the expected segment divisions, taking on their own pattern. The lighting strips above them cut across the ceiling’s original net of reinforced concrete Kahn bars but are kept light enough in grain and interval to show, in contrast, the older structure. The air registers, similarly, are now wrapped in Aalto-like timber blades.

    Architectus and Schmidt Hammer Lassen Architects’ brief shifts several other spaces around: lecture and seminar spaces are all moved to the Quad’s north side. The new Victoria Gallery is shaped from the service area on the north-east side, and the classicist Russell Street entry (surprisingly austere for 1906) is completely reworked inside, with the bookshop to one side and a new cafe on the other.4 By surrounding the bookshop with a mesh curtain of three-millimetre steel rods, Architectus and Schmidt Hammer Lassen Architects has been able to keep the original, cuboid space while simultaneously generating movement and a rather festive sense.
    The Newspapers and Family History Reading Rooms (combined in a shared gallery) have shifted south of the Redmond Barry Reading Room, and the Arts Reading Room has been positioned alongside; both are long, pure white spaces. The former first-floor catalogue room is now a quiet reading lounge and, in another surprise, its spiral stack stair has been partitioned off to create a separate space at the Quad and Dome entrances. These new spaces – the lounge, furnished appropriately with armchairs and low tables; and the stair as a surprise in the entry vestibule corner, lifted from its old role yet reminiscent of it – reflect Architectus and Schmidt Hammer Lassen Architects’ approach to the library and its many chapters.
    Between the Quad and the west foyer sits the long-closed grand stair to the Dome and Queen’s Hall, a ceremony in polished stone. Its west wall carries Harold Septimus Power’s War mural (1924), its east Napier Waller’s Grecian Peace after victory (1929); both embody the “memorial city” mood of that period. The challenge for the architects was to add stairs and balustrades that meet current safety standards. The new tissue, copper-bronze metal, stone treads and balustrading are bold but also look surprisingly right, creating a gleaming river of energy that cascades down through the original stair and its panelling.
    The Queen’s Hall has a long, newly revealed skylight ceiling in coved, diamond-pane clear glass, shielded from hail and rain by an outer canopy in polycarbonate that is unseen from either the street or the inside. (The glass in the skylights in the original hall was shattered during a thunderstorm in 1901, although the skylights remained in place until the early 1970s.) Ionic three-quarter columns, newly accentuated, give the hall a spine and, as originally, frame book bays (which include a considerable chess and bridge collection) based on the eighteenth- and nineteenth-century shelved alcove model. The shelves are now half-height and less obvious, allowing a greater sense of lateral space. The centre-aisle tables, movable for functions, are new and plain; the Victorian tables, massive and intricate in their hinged lecterns and leather detailing, now sit unobtrusively in four- and six-seat bays along the west wall. The late 1980s alterations revived Victorian pastel layering à la English architect and designer Owen Jones. The plain new colouration is Architectus and Schmidt Hammer Lassen Architects’ boldest move here; it dramatizes the former inset panels and gallery friezes, with their carefully uncovered nineteenth-century patterning and colours.
    What marks this refurbishment is the architects’ willingness to go with the building’s idiosyncrasies and episodes. The work recognizes that large institutional buildings such as this carry inside them their own history and culture, and that refurbishment is as much a weaving, a negotiation, as an outright renewal.
    — Conrad Hamann is associate professor in architectural history and history of urban form at RMIT University. He worked in the State Library of Victoria almost every week between 1972 and 1999, and he has often worked there since. He is the author of five books and about 130 other publications, and he has assisted on approximately 150 heritage reports for Lovell Chen. More