More stories

  • in

    Abstract Expressionist Michael West Was Overlooked for Decades. A New Show Revives Her Lost Legacy

    For the past five years, New York’s Hollis Taggart gallery has been championing the work of Michael (Corinne) West (1908–1991), a little-known Abstract Expressionist woman painter whose life’s work was fortuitously rescued from a city auction when her estate went unclaimed.
    Now, the gallery is presenting its most ambitious showing of West’s work to date, taking a deep dive into the artist’s archives to present reproductions of her writings and other documentation related to paintings on view in “Chronicling an Artistic Practice: Michael West Paintings and Archives From the 1950s to 1970s.”
    A photo of Michael Corrine West with her painting Vietnam Summer (1963) at her solo show at Granite Galleries in New York. Photo courtesy of Hollis Taggart, New York.
    “We have photos, news clippings, notebooks, sketchbooks, a lot of stuff,” gallery director Kara Spellman told me at the show’s opening.
    Spellman is currently overseeing the production of a catalogue raisonné of West’s work—something that could never have happened were it not for Stuart and Roberta Friedman, who fortuitously purchased a painting by West at a Westchester thrift shop in 1989. When they finally tracked down the artist to learn more about her, they discovered she had recently died, and the city of New York was about to sell her estate.
    Michael (Corinne) West, Untitled (ca. 1960s). Photo courtesy of Hollis Taggart, New York.
    The couple bought it all, some 110 paintings on canvas and 500 works on paper, in additions to the archives.
    Since Hollis Taggart took over, all but about 40 of the paintings have been sold—but the gallery has been quietly buying up other West works, some of which are being sold for the first time in the current show, and considers its efforts to raise the artist’s profile as part of a longterm project.
    Michael (Corinne) West, The Green Table (1966). Photo courtesy of Hollis Taggart, New York.
    “I think it takes repetition to get an artist into limelight,” the dealer told me. “She’s a very important, undervalued, under appreciated artist—even now compared to other women artists of the same period who I see out there, like Lynne Drexler and Alice Baber who I don’t think are as important as she is, but have far greater market value.”
    There are 14 oil on canvas works on view in the current show, priced starting at $45,000 for the 13-inch-tall Head, and up to $225,000 for the show’s only figurative painting, Flowers. (Most are between $100,000 and $165,000.) Works on paper range from $4,500 to $6,500. The artist’s auction high of $176,400, according to the Artnet Price Database, was set in 2022 at Sotheby’s New York, for roughly double the painting’s presale estimate. (Before 2019, her work had only hit five figures three times.)
    Michael (Corinne) West, Flowers (1952). Photo courtesy of Hollis Taggart, New York.
    West was one of Hans Hoffman’s first students at New York’s Art Students League in 1932. In the hopes of being taken seriously by the art world, she even adopted the male name Michael—she was born Corinne—at the suggestion of her close friend Arshile Gorky, who is said to have proposed to her, unsuccessfully, no less than six times. (West instead married war photographer and experimental filmmaker Francis Lee.)
    Gorky’s love letters to West were—until Hollis Taggart became champions of her work—the main reason her name was known to art historians and scholars. Another was photographs of West by her friend Richard Pousette-Dart.
    “Chronicling an Artistic Practice: Michael West Paintings and Archives From the 1950s to 1970s” at Hollis Taggart, New York. Photo courtesy of Hollis Taggart, New York.
    But West was much more than a muse. Not only an artist in her own right, she was also a prolific writer and poet with strong opinions about art and creativity.
    West’s “Notes on Art,” which she began keeping in the 1940s, identified the burgeoning Ab Ex movement as “The New Art” in 1948. She could also be quite cutting—one entry describes “third rate realism displayed in gold frames [that] looked like someone had just cleared the attic.”
    Michael (Corinne) West’s archives include this note in which she writes critically of a realism exhibition. Photo courtesy of Hollis Taggart, New York.
    “She had a lot of humor—a lot of comments about a lot of different styles of art,” Spellman said. “She was constantly seeing shows.”
    The archives, which the gallery hopes sell to a U.S. museum also include West’s written records of her day-to-day life. There is her diary about going to see the doctor or needing to pay the rent—something that was often a struggle for West.
    “She would write, ‘I got an eviction notice again. Do I pay rent or do I buy paint?’” Spellman said.
    For while West was very much a part of the New York School, and was a working artist throughout her life, she never had a true breakthrough moment. Sadly, a solo show at a major New York gallery eluded West her entire career.
    Michael (Corinne) West, Vietnam Summer (1963). Photo courtesy of Hollis Taggart, New York.
    At times, West had seemed at the cusp of receiving greater recognition for her work. She was in a 1945 Pinacotheca Gallery exhibition that included artists such as Mark Rothko and Milton Avery. And in 1953, Flowers was part of the well-known Stable Gallery’s second annual exhibition alongside such luminaries as Willem de Kooning, Robert Motherwell, Franz Kline, and Joan Mitchell.
    A career highlight was a studio visit from Jackson Pollock and Peggy Guggenheim, which West wrote of in her diary.
    “Peggy told her that she paints life,” Spellman said.
    Michael (Corinne) West’s recollections of the Abstract Expressionist movement in New York mention a studio visit from Peggy Guggenheim and Jackson Pollock. Photo courtesy of Hollis Taggart, New York.
    But Guggenheim never exhibited West’s work. In 1957, the artist had an exhibition in the city at Uptown Gallery, followed by a 1958 outing at Domino Gallery in Georgetown, Washington, D.C. In the 1960s, she had two New York shows, at Granite Galleries and Imaginary Art, with her final exhibition in 1978 at the city’s Womanart Gallery. (Posthumously, West had a show at the Pollock-Krasner House and Study Center in East Hampton in 1996 and New York’s Art Resource Group in 2010.) But other opportunities failed to materialize.
    “She was asked to show in Paris, but with the expenses, she couldn’t pull it together,” Spellman added.
    A flyer for Michael (Corinne) West’s final solo show during her lifetime, at New York’s Womanart Gallery in 1978. Photo courtesy of Hollis Taggart, New York .
    Nevertheless, West estimated that she sold some 40 paintings, a slow but steady stream of sales that made it possible for her to continue working even as Pop art supplanted Abstract Expressionism as the leading art movement. Though her health declined following a series of strokes in her later years, West made work until the end, with her last drawing dated to 1991, the year of her death.
    “She was just very dedicated,” Spellman said, “to making art.”
    “Chronicling an Artistic Practice: Michael West Paintings and Archives From the 1950s to 1970s” is on view at Hollis Taggart, 521 West 26th Street, New York, New York, through February 22, 2025. More

  • in

    How Christine Sun Kim’s Whitney Survey Reimagines Sound, Silence, and Expression

    Artist Christine Sun Kim used the word “homecoming” during the preview to her major new show at the Whitney Museum, titled “All Day All Night.” And it’s an apt one that takes on multiple meanings.
    For starters, Kim—whose wide-ranging practice explores sound and the complexities of communicating in both her native American Sign Language (ASL) and written English—got her start at the Whitney as an educator in 2007. Kim, who was born Deaf, was instrumental in developing the museum’s programs and resources to support other Deaf audience members, notably the ASL vlogs that broadened access to the Whitney’s collection to a much wider audience around the world.
    Installation view of “Christine Sun Kim: All Day All Night” at the Whitney Museum of American Art, New York, 2025. Photo: David Tufino.
    “Being an educator here at the Whitney had an effect on me as an artist,” said Kim, via an ASL interpreter. “Having access to the information that the museum has—meaning access to art history—was pivotal for me. I never had that kind of access in the past. Learning what I did here, I decided to go back to graduate school, which is how I got into sound and words. For me, this was a big push in becoming an artist.”
    This marks the largest show to date for the artist, after she was included in the museum’s 2019 biennial and created the content for the outdoor billboard space in 2018. “All Day All Night” is as fascinating and thought-provoking as it is expansive. It occupies the lion’s share of the museum’s eighth-floor exhibition spaces, as well as galleries on the third floor and the first-floor lobby galleries to which admission is free.
    Christine Sun Kim, Degrees of Deaf Rage in Everyday Situations (2018). Courtesy Y.D.C. © Christine Sun Kim. Courtesy François Ghebaly Gallery and WHITE SPACE
    Fans of her work will recognize the razor-sharp commentary in the charcoal drawing Degrees of My Deaf Rage in the Art World (featured in the biennial) that takes aim at, for instance, “museums with zero deaf programming (and no deaf docents/educators)” with respective ratings of “full on rage” or “obtuse rage” depending on the specifics of the situation. Another large drawing, with the self-explanatory title, Shit Hearing People Say to Me, has an accompanying detailed pie chart. There are also sound experiments where vibrating surfaces on which items like paintbrushes or tacks are laid, then translated into visual marks and accompanying performance videos.
    The artist uses “musical notation, infographics, and language to produce drawings, videos, sculptures and installations that often explore non-auditory political dimensions in sound,” said curator Jennie Goldstein. The works range in date from 2011 to 2024 and consider “these core concerns, as well as the importance of family, community, and the complex negotiations of shared social spaces.”
    Christine Sun Kim, How Do You Hold Your Debt (2022) Collection of Jenny Osterhout and Santiago Martinez Govela. © Christine Sun Kim. Courtesy François Ghebaly Gallery and WHITE SPACE
    The title “All Day All Night” refers to a motif in Kim’s work—the visualizing of ASL signs for the sun moving over the horizon and dipping below it—which has cropped up in her early drawings from 2012 as much as her recently executed canvases from 2023. The title “also points to the energy that Christine brings to her artistic practice,” Goldstein added. “She is relentlessly experimental, iterative, and dedicated to sharing her deaf-lived experience with audiences.”
    L to R: Whitney curator Jennie Goldstein, artist Christine Sun Kim and Whitney director Scott Rothkopk at the opening of “Christine Sun Kim: All Day, All Night”
    This is helped by Kim’s amazing ability to distill complex ideas in an accessible way, both in her work and in discussions about it. For instance, at the preview, she offered an rare view into her experience of the echo. “Yes, it’s a sound but it’s also a deaf experience that we go through,” she said. “My interpreter right now is echoing back what I’m saying… She’ll also echo what you’ll say into sign language… so my deaf experience is very echo-y.”
    The artist said that despite studying graphic design for just one year, it has gotten into her mindset, and how she views the world. Perhaps not surprisingly, she nods to word-centric contemporary art star Ed Ruscha in one of the catalogue essays. The room erupted in laughter when Kim said she views the word “echo” itself as “a beautiful word,” and then added with a shrug: “It’s four letters, it’s very balanced. The E, the C, the H, the O are so cute.”
    Installation view of “Christine Sun Kim: All Day All Night” at the Whitney Museum of American Art, New York, 2025. Photo: Audrey Wang.
    On the Whitney’s third floor, visitors will experience this exploration of echo as it is laid out visually in drawings and murals across the walls. “The arcing black forms visualize the shape of the sign for echo,” said Goldstein, “where four fingers of one hand contact the palm of the other and then move away in a motion resembling an illustration an echoing sound wave.”
    The first floor gallery presents drawings, videos, and a large kinetic installation featuring large inflated red balloons shaped like arms that reach out to touch a stone-like object. The works “explore the interconnectedness of ASL and deaf culture,” said Goldstein. She noted that some drawings consider the role that sign language interpreters play in making the artist sound different ways, while other works compare specific written English words and phrases with their counterparts in Deaf English or short hand translations in ASL.
    Installation view of “Christine Sun Kim: All Day All Night” at the Whitney Museum of American Art, New York, 2025. Photo: Audrey Wang.
    Kim pointed out that although this is her largest project to date, it’s “not a long-term survey. This is just a few years that we’re looking at here. I’m still getting going.”
    She also noted that she left New York 12 years ago for Berlin and has now been there longer than she lived in New York. “So coming home does feel like an actual homecoming.”
    Museum director Scott Rothkopf also noted in his remarks introducing the show, that Kim is the first artist-in-residence at Roy Lichtenstein’s former home and studio on nearby Washington Street, which was donated to the museum’s Independent Study Program two years ago, as a permanent home.
    “The chapter that I got to have as an educator is now a full circle because I got here as an artist,” said Kim. “I am very touched and very happy to be here.”
    “Christine Sun Kim: All Day All Night” is on view at the Whitney Museum of American Art, 99 Gansevoort St, New York, February 8–July 6. More

  • in

    How Do You Survey an Artist Whose Work Was Temporary and Site-Specific?

    Late one night in the spring of 2010, after a burger and beers with friends at J.G. Melon on Manhattan’s Upper East Side, I had an all-time-great art experience. It was around 1 a.m. and unusually hot, as I recall, when we walked the few blocks over to the Whitney. The biennial was on view, and the museum was still open. Not many people were inside, but they all seemed to be having a great time—almost immediately, we were, too. At that hour, the show felt more intense than during the day, more vivid. Bruce High Quality Foundation’s haunted hearse has stuck with me, and Charles Ray’s luscious ink flowers, and Piotr Uklański’s astonishing wall of textiles. It was dreamy.
    The artist Michael Asher, then 66, was responsible for us being there. He had asked the Whitney to stay open, nonstop, for seven days. The museum said that it could afford three days, and that was that. This was prime Asher: an incisive proposal that tests the limits of its commissioner while paying pleasurable dividends to its audience. The project is not included in the richly researched Asher survey that Artists Space is hosting in New York through Saturday, but 20 similarly fertile ones are. If you are interested in what artists can do, how they can operate in our conservative industry, it is an essential stop. It is a rousing, unexpectedly funny, and improbable show.
    I never thought someone would do it. A godhead of so-called institutional critique, Asher participated in all the grand affairs (Documenta, Skulptur Projekte Münster, Venice) and staged exhibitions at august institutions. But, when he died in 2012, at 69, he left behind little of what one could classify as art, strictly speaking. His efforts were site-specific, and they endure largely through photos, books, paperwork, and other ephemera. (Out of perverse curiosity, I searched Artnet’s auction database and found that only three of his works have been resold publicly for more than $700. His record is $33,000, for a Minimal sculpture from the late-1960s. After that, he pretty much abandoned making traditional art objects.)
    Installation view of “Michael Asher” at Artists Space in New York. Photo: Carter Seddon. Image Courtesy Artists Space, New York and the Michael Asher Archive, Michael Asher Foundation.
    Asher devoted himself to getting to the core of matters—mediums, industry norms, art’s efficacy—and highlighting what tends to go unseen. (He taught for more than 30 years at CalArts; crits in his “Post Studio Art” class were known to run deep into the night.) Invited to contribute to a star-studded 1975 magazine called Vision, he requested that two pages be glued together, a work that would “embody and represent the material conditions of its presentation,” he said. A year later, for a show in Portland, Ore., he asked a local TV station to broadcast its control room for 30 minutes. “There is nothing to take seriously, no manipulation to obey or lifestyle to be bought,” he wrote.
    When Asher was approached by a venturesome Los Angeles couple to conceive something for their home, he proposed a piece that was about, and that utilized, private property. Would they be willing to move a wall at one corner of their lot 11 inches toward their house, effectively giving up ground to a neighbor? They would. (A subsequent owner destroyed that intervention.)
    Artists Space’s show—which was curated by its director, Jay Sanders, and Stella Cilman, its assistant curator—narrates Asher’s endeavors in an illuminating (and free!) catalogue. There are also large wall murals of documentary photos and all kinds of printed matter that accompanied various projects, like a legendary publication that Asher made in 1999 for an exhibition at the Museum of Modern Art. It lists the more than 400 paintings and sculptures that the institution had deaccessioned since its founding in 1929. You are free to peruse many of these vintage materials—a welcoming gesture.
    Installation view of “Michael Asher” at Artists Space in New York. Photo: Carter Seddon. Image Courtesy Artists Space, New York and the Michael Asher Archive, Michael Asher Foundation.
    Some of Asher’s work can sound like airtight art about art (a 1973 film presents only a blank, gray image), but give it a chance. He was intent on demonstrating a sometimes-elusive fact: In art, everything is up for negotiation, everything can be questioned. At least that’s how it should be. His projects function almost like folktales, revealing what our society values and how it operates. (“Have you heard about the time that he declined to restage one of his old works for a museum survey about conceptual art and instead offered to design advertisements for the show?”)
    In one of my favorite pieces, from the mid-1980s, Asher secured the right to rename the lobby of a temporary location of the Museum of Contemporary in Los Angeles after himself: the Michael Asher Lobby. In an archival photo, a sign with that designation hangs in front of wall text for an exhibition by the Land Art king Michael Heizer (who had to get his name into the museum the old-fashioned way). It turns out that I did not know the full story. Asher actually bought the licensing rights to the lobby and then leased them back to the museum for $200 a month. Those financial shenanigans (private equity professionals, eat your heart out) make me like the work even more.
    A handful of artists have followed Asher’s freethinking lead. Cameron Rowland, 37 this year, plumbs institutional histories with a gimlet eye and often creates site-specific works that concern property. There is also Maria Eichhorn, two decades younger than Asher, who in 2016 shuttered the Chisenhale gallery in London and gave its team a vacation. A more fraught example: You could argue that Merlin Carpenter was channeling Asher, in 2006, when he used a $4,000 production fee from the Institute of Contemporary Art Philadelphia to buy luxury goods, which he subsequently displayed.
    Installation view of “Michael Asher” at Artists Space in New York. Photo: Carter Seddon. Image Courtesy Artists Space, New York and the Michael Asher Archive, Michael Asher Foundation.
    One can wish that more artists would take the Asher approach, while understanding why they don’t. It’s hard enough to make a living by selling attractive paintings. Getting by in the game of institutional critique? Forget about it. (One lesson of Asher’s career, a tough one, is that it is OK for ambitious artists to have a day job. It might even be a good thing.)
    Strolling through Artists Space’s airy, witty show, I had the sense that each exhibit offered a portal into a completely different way of making or presenting art, and just maybe, of being in the world. Homeowners can choose to cede a bit of land for good (or even abstract) reasons. Museums can choose to be open late into the night, as a respite for people who work during the day, or who just don’t want the evening to end after a few rounds at the bar.
    Museums can also choose to be catalysts for unexpected, enlivening collaborations. In the early 2000s, Asher asked the Los Angeles County Museum of Art to allow local students to rehang one of its galleries of 19th-century European art. Over a few months, the kids were taught about curating and the collection, and were then given free rein to place the works, so long as no art or museum patrons were at risk of harm. One group installed orange, purple, and green lights and banished a Delacroix to a stairwell. Another brought in mirrors and a John Coltrane soundtrack. They wrote, “We hope that our efforts please you and that the unorthodox presentation of the art and utilization of three-dimensional space in no way frightens you.”
    When was the last time that you read such a candid, satisfying curatorial statement? More

  • in

    Victoria Beckham’s London Boutique Plays Host to Contemporary Masterpieces

    This week, the Victoria Beckham boutique on Dover Street in London is getting an arty makeover. Across the three-level Georgian building, the designer and collector has installed a selection of contemporary artworks, which appear right at home in the chic, well-appointed space. It is, she said, “a wonderful place to celebrate other people’s work.”
    “If you can come into the store, and shop while looking at George Condo,” she told the Financial Times, “it absolutely doesn’t get any better than that.”
    Installation view of Richard Prince, Untitled (2020) and George Condo, Artist and Muse (2015) at Victoria Beckham Dover Street in London. Photo courtesy of Sotheby’s.
    The transformation of the flagship store comes by way of Beckham’s partnership with Sotheby’s. With help from the auction house’s specialist, the former Spice Girl has picked 11 artworks for display—pieces by Francis Bacon, Keith Haring, Yoshitomo Nara, Jean-Michel Basquiat, Joan Mitchell, Gerhard Richter, Yves Klein, and of course, Condo. The works are on view from February 6–10, before they head to the block at Sotheby’s forthcoming Contemporary auctions in London and New York.
    This latest project follows Beckham’s 2018 project with Sotheby’s, when a selection of works by Old Masters—Fede Galizia and Elisabeth-Louise Vigée Le Brun among them—was similarly exhibited at her Dover Street boutique.
    Installation view of Jean-Michel Basquiat, Red Joy (1984) at Victoria Beckham Dover Street in London. Photo courtesy of Sotheby’s.
    “It has been such a joy to collaborate with Victoria, who has an incredible eye and a deep connection with storytelling through art and design,” said Haleigh Stoddard, Sotheby’s head of contemporary curated, in a statement. “As an established collector of contemporary art, Victoria is somebody who has never been afraid to try new things or to change and evolve or reinvent over time—an ethos which chimes so wonderfully with that of many of the artists presented in this exhibition.”
    While Beckham admits to being no “great expert” in visual art, she boasts a deep love for the medium—and has the collection to prove it. She was introduced to collecting when she, along with her husband, football star David, visited Elton John at his home in Nice, France. There, she encountered a Julian Schnabel work, one that she remembered as “my first experience with art and really seeing it up close.”
    Installation view of Keith Haring, Untitled (1983) at Victoria Beckham Dover Street in London. Photo courtesy of Sotheby’s.
    From there, Victoria and David commenced building an art collection. They began with a piece from Schnabel’s “Sonanbul” series (the colors of which inspired the palette of Beckham’s Fall 2024 collection), before including works by Nan Goldin, Damien Hirst, Yayoi Kusama, Tracey Emin, and Nara.
    “For David and I, collecting is about more than just investing or acquiring beautiful objects,” she said in a statement. “It’s about finding pieces that bring us real joy. The more I delve into art history and progress on my journey as a collector, the more captivated I am by it.”
    Yoshitomo Nara, Cosmic Eyes (in the Milky Lane) (2005). Photo courtesy of Sotheby’s.
    Nara, in particular, has resounded with the designer. The work by the Japanese artist currently on view at her store is the six-feet tall Cosmic Eyes (in the Milky lake) (2005), featuring one of Nara’s creepy-charming characters fixing the viewer with an unflinching gaze. To Beckham, “there’s a childlike innocence mixed with a real edge and an eeriness.”
    “This is one of the things I Iove so much about Nara,” she added. “His images seem straightforward, but as you start to move closer, you realize they have so much more to say. Despite the sophistication of the muted color palette, he never loses that sense of playfulness which is something I always try to weave into my collections.”
    Joan Mitchell, Pastel (1991). Photo courtesy of Sotheby’s.
    Elsewhere in the temporary display are vibrant pieces from Basquiat’s 1984 jazzy, dynamic Red Joy to Mitchell’s Pastel, a dynamic abstract landscape from 1991 to two untitled Harings that speak to Beckham’s love for American Pop art. Richard Prince’s Untitled (2020), a large, energetic canvas, from his “High Times” series, takes pride of place.
    Yves Klein, Bleu monochrome (IKB 296). Photo courtesyo f Sotheby’s.
    Also included is a Richter that Beckham admires for its “luminosity” and one of Klein’s iconic Bleu monochromes, which she dubs “an instantly recognizable visual signature.”
    Condo is represented by his abstract double portrait Artist and Muse (2015), believed to depict Picasso and his muse Sylvette. The painting’s contrasting tones and heavy brushwork, said Beckham, offer “beautiful and layered interpretation” of the connection between Picasso and his muse—and in turn, that of Condo and one of his key influences, Picasso.
    George Condo, Artist and Muse (2015). Photo courtesy of Sotheby’s.
    “Art has always been a source of inspiration and over the years, I’ve so enjoyed learning and educating myself,” Beckham said. “It has the power to spark ideas, evoke emotion—and in the case of contemporary art in particular—it speaks to the world around us.” More

  • in

    Sophie von Hellermann Taps Into the Spirit of Ziggy Stardust in a New London Show

    The painter Sophie von Hellermann is known for loosely rendered, fantastical scenes inspired by fables and mythologies. In a new series of images, currently on view at Pilar Corrias in London, her painterly apparitions feel like fragments of a dream, bathed in pale moonlight and beamed from outer space.
    The show, “Moonage,” which runs through March 22, borrows its title from David Bowie’s song “Moonage Daydream,” which in 1971 heralded the debut of the character Ziggy Stardust, dreamed up to bring hope to Earth in the form of an androgynous, alien rock star, with a bright red mullet and glamorous lightning bolt bodysuits. He came to personify the ceaselessly inventive nature of Bowie’s vision, and his embrace of the otherworldly. Von Hellermann pays tribute in one of the show’s standout works, Ziggy Stardust (2025).
    Installation view of “Sophie von Hellermann: Moonage” at Pilar Corrias in London until March 22, 2025. Photography: Ben Westoby, courtesy the artist and Pilar Corrias, London.
    The new show at Pilar Corrias features not only the canvases for which von Hellermann is best known but also painted objects, textiles, and pieces of design. It is as though the German artist’s brush has run free, sweeping over neighboring curtains and lampshades until they too are covered in generous swathes of zestful color. A similar effect was achieved for the gallery’s standout solo booth of von Hellerman’s works at Frieze London in 2023, when blue, orange, and purple pigment spilled out onto the carpet, unleashing the paintings’ playful whimsy.
    The lampshades, an unusual addition to the gallery space, add to the exhibition’s mystical, midnight hour feel, where our perception of the real fades into a reverie. The gallery describes how the device is intended to make the paintings “glint and flicker, like a large-scale magic lantern that scatters dreams across the gallery.”
    Sophie von Hellermann, Moonage (2023). Image courtesy the artist and Pilar Corrias, London.
    Von Hellermann, who prefers not to over-explain her work, said only of the unique gallery space that “my hope was to create a dramatic installation that underlines the urgency in the paintings.”
    The rest is left open to interpretation, as von Hellerman’s fluid application of pigment to build up painterly vignettes with just a light touch are an invitation to our imagination, or even our subconscious. Who is the mysterious couple in Moonage (2023), who seem to float on water while gazing up entranced at the full moon?
    Sophie von Hellermann, Ziggy Stardust (2025). Image courtesy the artist and Pilar Corrias, London.
    What would it feel like to journey into another universe? Paradoxically, Press Your Space Face Close to Mine (2025) evokes both a bold voyage into the unknown and the safe comfort of an intimate embrace. In dreams, perhaps both are possible, as the rocket’s vibrating outline fades into the starry sky.
    “The paintings are tinted with emotion,” von Hellermann hinted in an interview last summer. “It helps communicate emotions to make something more vivid or warmer.”
    Sophie von Hellermann, One Night at the Carlyle (2024). Image courtesy the artist and Pilar Corrias, London.
    In compositions that discard the strictures of traditional genre, faces melt into flower bouquets. This hallucinatory effect is achieved by von Hellermann’s preference for what she describes as “fast painting. I need to have an image quickly.” In doing so, she allows the strange and unexpected to emerge unimpeded from her paintbrush. But, how does she know when a composition is done?
    “Successful paintings are those where it all comes together,” said von Hellermann. “The moment, the materials, the light, and the idea. I bring everything into play and then it works and is communicated on the canvas.”
    “Sophie von Hellermann: Moonage”  is on view at Pilar Corrias, 51 Conduit Street, London, through March 22, 2025.  More

  • in

    Michelangelo’s Drawings for the Sistine Chapel Visit the U.S. for the First Time

    Dozens of drawings Michelangelo made while planning the ceiling of the Sistine Chapel will go on view at the Muscarelle Museum of Art after a monumental feat in networking and logistics by the Williamsburg, Virginia museum ahead of the Renaissance master’s 550th anniversary.
    Curator Adriano Marinazzo, an architect and Michelangelo expert, has organized a show that offers an extremely rare chance to see 25 drawings that were used to plan for the celebrated ceiling and another fresco in the Sistine Chapel known as The Last Judgment.
    Of those drawings, seven have never traveled to the United States. Most have never been shown together. In total, some 38 objects are going on view, including a famous portrait of Michelangelo in the time between his work painting the ceiling and The Last Judgment by his contemporary Giuliano Bugiardini.
    “What he likely did, and this is a typical fresco sort of process, is make large drawings, putting them up on the ceiling and likely poking holes at various inflection points in the drawing,” museum director David Brashear said in a video call.
    Adriano Marinazzo is pictured in 2012 at Casa Buonarroti studying Michelangelo’s original drawings. Courtesy of the Muscarelle Museum of Art.
    All of those “cartoons” were probably destroyed at the time they were used. In advance of those cartoons, he likely did hundreds, maybe thousands, of miniature drawing studies to work out compositional elements.
    “He destroyed almost all of them before dying because he was feeling sick. He knew he was dying. He never created them for public display,” Marinazzo said. “Now less than 50 survive and we have almost half of those, and four in preparation for The Last Judgment.”
    Brashear said the survivors, mostly preserved by Michelangelo’s nephew, are locked in dark boxes and only sanctioned by Italian authorities to leave for 12 weeks every few years. So Marinazzo painstakingly coordinated with Italian institutions and authorities to ensure the drawings would be available and not promised to another museum.
    Michelangelo Buonarroti, Study for the Prophet Zechariah (1508). Courtesy of Gallerie degli Uffizi, Gabinetto dei Disegni e delle Stampe, via the Muscarelle Museum of Art.
    One drawing Marinazzo sought could not be loaned for this show, Brashear noted, because it had already been promised to the British Museum. Nevertheless, he commended Marinazzo’s effective coordination in securing notable examples for the College of William & Mary museum.
    Earlier in his career, the Italian curator worked with the Casa Buonarroti, a museum dedicated to Michelangelo in the home he bought for his family when he found success. Marinazzo became close friends with Casa Buonarroti’s late director, Pina Ragionieri.
    “You have to make sure that you can reassure the lenders that all of the best museum practices will be in place as you have them in your custody,” Brashear said. “Then, of course, they travel with couriers and are guarded all the way. It’s a complicated process. It’s very different from collecting and hosting an exhibition on, say, Cézanne paintings.”
    Michelangelo Buonarroti, Study for the Cumaean Sibyl (1510). Courtesy of Biblioteca Reale via the Muscarelle Museum of Art.
    Brashear added that the exhibition will include massive recreations of scenes from the Sistine Chapel ceiling, a showcase that came about because of the Muscarelle’s partnership with the Vatican Museums. “We’re not getting any drawings from them,” he said, “but we are getting their highest level of detail image files that we’re allowed to use in the exhibition.”
    “That’s where it’s really going to become powerful for viewers,” Brashear added. “Like, ‘this is the head of one of the figures in the Sistine Chapel ceiling frescoes’ and ‘this is what it looks like in the final form, as Michelangelo put it up on the ceiling.’”
    The idea for this exhibition was born in 2012, while he worked in Casa Buonarotti’s dusty archives, Marinazzo said. As he read Michelangelo’s letters, he spotted a sonnet with a sketch underneath that the artist likely sent to his friend Giovanni da Pistoia.
    Michelangelo Buonarroti, Self-portrait in the act of painting the Sistine ceiling with autograph sonnet (c. 1509–10). Courtesy of Casa Buonarroti via the Muscarelle Museum of Art.
    “Nobody knew what it was. After a while, I understood, since I’m an architect, that this little sketch was the representation of a ceiling,” he said. “Eventually, I thought to put together ‘Michelangelo’ and a ‘ceiling’ and realized it might be a sketch for the Sistine Chapel.”
    Experts consider it to be perhaps the first drawing Michelangelo made for the project. Another very famous sonnet in the exhibition, also likely sent to Giovanni da Pistoia, contains a self-portrait of Michelangelo painting the ceiling. The show marks the first time these two sonnets with sketches about the Sistine ceiling are together.
    The exhibition features two drawings of apostles that “were almost forgotten by scholars” but are significant because they were ultimately not used in the ceiling. When Pope Julius II commissioned Michelangelo to design the ceiling, he asked him to paint the 12 apostles over the ceiling’s pendentives. Michelangelo started the sketches but ultimately told the pope he didn’t just want to paint the apostles, and they were scrapped.
    Michelangelo Buonarroti, Study for a male face for the Flood (c. 1508–1509). Courtesy of Casa Buonarroti via the Muscarelle Museum of Art.
    Marinazzo also described how the show’s organization directly led to a new discovery about the drawings. Scholars had previously thought that two little sketches on two different pieces of paper were probably part of the same sheet of paper.
    “But we didn’t have any proof,” he said. Before such valuable drawings are shipped, their condition is checked by restorers. Restorers put them together and found the line where they were connected. “So, we are publishing this, too. The drawings will be framed together and presented for the first time in the exhibition together.”
    The show is laid out through several galleries, Marinazzo said. The first three are dedicated to the ceiling, with the fourth dedicated to The Last Judgment, and the exhibition is capped with works by Marinazzo that contextualize Michelangelo’s work for the public.
    Michelangelo Buonarroti. Study for the Prophet Jonah (1512). Photo courtesy of Casa Buonarroti via the Muscarelle Museum of Art
    One of the topics is the relationship between the artist’s sculptural work on the tomb of Julius II and the painting of the Sistine ceiling. For this exhibition, Marinazzo prepared 3D renderings of what he believes the tomb would have looked like if completed.
    He argued that the Sistine Chapel ceiling is inherently tied to the commission of the tomb, including its artistic design. In 1505, Michelangelo traveled to Rome. Pope Julius II requested that Michelangelo build a large tomb that would feature 40 statues. Although the original drawings are lost, the initial design is described.
    Michelangelo went to Carrara to collect marble for the project and returned to Rome to request additional funds. However, Pope Julius II shifted his focus to constructing the new Saint Peter’s Church and was no longer interested in completing the tomb.
    A comparison between Michelangelo’s sketch of the architectural outline of the Sistine Chapel ceiling and the actual ceiling view, digitally elaborated by Adriano Marinazzo. Courtesy of the Muscarelle Museum of Art.
    Michelangelo felt slighted and returned to Florence. The pope sent emissaries to persuade him to return to Rome, emphasizing that his skills were needed. Initially, Michelangelo refused but eventually complied after further pressure from Florence’s ruler, who did not want conflict with Rome.
    Ultimately, Michelangelo met Julius in Bologna, where they agreed he would resume work on the tomb and take on a new commission for the Sistine ceiling. The tomb as it was initially designed was not completed, but this established a connection between them.
    “If you read the description of the tomb by Vasari, a biographer and contemporary of Michelangelo, it recalls the painted architecture in the ceiling,” he said. “So, I recreated the 3D structure over the architecture, and I use these architectural elements, combined with the description by Vasari, to make a reconstruction of the tomb that was never built.”
    The show also includes an installation titled This Is Not My Art, made by the curator, that contextualizes the show.
    Adriano Marinazzo, This is Not My Art. Courtesy of Muscarelle Museum of Art.
    A memo Michelangelo wrote in 1508, when he moved from Florence to Rome to start to work on the ceiling, also appears. And the museum got ahold of a famous letter from Michelangelo’s friend, Francesco Granacci, that has never been on view. In the letter, Granacci whines about complications in recruiting assistants to paint the ceiling.
    Brashear noted that, because of the significance of the exhibition, the museum coordinated with local authorities to plan for a major influx of visitors. Luckily, the city is already prepared for tourists because of the Colonial Williamsburg historical complex.
    “When we previously did Italian master exhibitions, we shared them with MFA Boston, a museum much larger than us. We put the shows together and then they bought in and invested and took it for half of those 12 weeks,” Brashear said. “With the reopening of our museum, we wanted to be the sole venue and have it for the full 12 weeks.”
    “Michelangelo: The Genesis of the Sistine” will be on view at the Muscarelle Museum of Art, 603 Jamestown Road, Williamsburg, Virginia, March 6–May 28. More

  • in

    Billionaire Francois Pinault’s Art Collection Gets Los Angeles Showcase

    During Frieze Los Angeles later this month, Christie’s will host at its Beverly Hills branch an exhibition of art belonging to Francois Pinault, the French billionaire businessman whose holdings include the auction house.
    The show, titled “Eye Contact,” will include a wide range of portraiture by eight artists: Marlene Dumas, Llyn Foulkes, Thomas Houseago, William Pope L., Jim Shaw, Cindy Sherman, Luc Tuymans, and Lynette Yiadom-Boakye. Nothing will be for sale, according to Christie’s. Houseago will install his outdoor sculptures on Christie’s first-floor terrace in collaboration with the Pinault Collection’s curatorial team. A fun fact: More than half of the over 10,000 works in Pinault’s holdings address the subject of the human body.
    The show was initially slated to open last month, but was bumped to February due to the devastating wildfires in Los Angeles.
    Christie’s recently appointed CEO Bonnie Brennan noted in an email that “Eye Contact” is the latest in a string of non-selling exhibitions that the auction house has hosted in L.A., which have included a 2023 show in collaboration with the local nonprofit Desert X, and in 2024, a presentation of Warhol film stills on loan from the Andy Warhol Museum in Pittsburgh.
    Thomas Houseago, Study (New York Mask I), (2010) Artist Credit: Thomas Houseago Studio © ARSPhoto Credit: Fredrik Nilsen Studio
    Selections from the Pinault Collection are regularly exhibited at three museums that it operates—the Palazzo Grassi and the Punta della Dogana in Venice and the Bourse de Commerce in Paris—as well as at other institutions around the world.
    Some of the works in the L.A. show have been seen only rarely, like paintings by Tuymans and Dumas that are making their U.S. debuts. Others have never been publicly displayed, such as a portrait of Pinault by Los Angeles artist Jim Shaw.
    Christie’s L.A. venue “is our second-largest gallery in the Americas, with beautiful exhibition space in our first floor galleries as well as our second floor terrace,” Brennan said. (Christie’s headquarters at Rockfeller Center in New York has the most gallery space.)
    Luc Tuymans, Anonymous III (2018). © Luc Tuymans. All rights reserved. Courtesy Studio Luc Tuymans, Antwerp, and David Zwirner
    In response to the recent wildfires, Christie’s has made donations to the California Community Foundation Wildfire Recovery Fund, the Los Angeles Food Bank, and the Getty’s L.A. Arts Community Fire Relief Fund. “Our hearts have broken for everyone affected by the devastation caused by the recent wildfires,” Brennan said. “We are proud to have a home in Los Angeles and will continue to stand in solidarity with our friends, family, and colleagues in this great city as we rebuild together.”
    “Eye Contact: An Invitation to the Pinault Collection,” will be on view at Christie’s Los Angeles, from Wednesday, February 12, through Friday, April 4. More

  • in

    What Is the ‘American Sublime’? Amy Sherald’s Biggest Museum Show Ever Has an Answer

    There are nearly 50 paintings in Amy Sherald’s biggest museum show to date, currently on view at the San Francisco Museum of Modern Art and set to touch down at New York’s Whitney Museum of American Art in April. Each and every one of them—most famously, of course, her portrait of former First Lady Michelle Obama—features African American subjects in colorful, fashionable outfits, their skin carefully rendered in shades of gray.
    “Grisaille is originally a Renaissance technique, but Sherald uses it in effect to minimize the associations with race,” SFMOMA associate curator Auriel Garza told me during a walk-through of the show. “It also creates a nice connection with black and white photography.”
    But Sherald’s reliance on grayscale does not mean the 51-year-old artist’s work has not evolved since she first hit upon this signature style in 2008. The exhibition includes her largest and most ambitious paintings to date, including a monumental new triptych—her first—titled Ecclesia (The Meeting of Inheritance and Horizons), that greets visitors at the show’s entrance.
    All three canvases depict a solitary figure looking out from a white watchtower, set against a bright blue sky. Their clothing is coded with references to the weather—one top features an orange-hued sunrise, the second is patterned with rain clouds, and the last is rainbow striped.
    Amy Sherald, Ecclesia (The Meeting of Inheritance and Horizons), 2024. Photo by Kelvin Bulluck, ©Amy Sherald, courtesy of Hauser & Wirth.
    “The figures in the painting are kind of looking out into the horizon, perhaps manifesting that brighter future,” Garza said, noting that the title comes from the Ancient Greek word for the assembly of citizens.
    And Sherald’s work hasn’t just grown in scale. Her compositions, all based on photographs she takes in the studio, have become more complex.
    She now carefully outfits her sitters from her fully stocked wardrobe, rather than painting them in their own clothes—one room displays a painting alongside the original clothes worn by the sitter, as well as a photo of Sherald at work in her studio—and even builds sets for her backdrops.  For the 2019 painting Precious Jewels by the Sea, she rented a larger studio and filled it with hundreds of gallons of sand to bring the beach scene to life.
    Amy Sherald, Precious Jewels by the Sea (2019). Collection of the Crystal Bridges Museum of American Art, Bentonville, Arkansas. Photo by Joseph Hyde, courtesy of the artist and Hauser & Wirth, ©Amy Sherald.
    Sherald designed the watch tower in Ecclesia, which is topped with different antique weather vanes in the three panels, based on the phone booth in a scene from Wes Anderson’s The Grand Budapest Hotel. (She’s also spoken before about her love of the lighthouse tower scene in his Moonrise Kingdom.)
    “It’s nice to see a painter in a mid career moment who is getting more and more dexterous,” SFMOMA director Christopher Bedford told me. “She is actually getting better.”
    Installation view of “Amy Sherald: American Sublime” at the San Francisco Museum of Modern Art. Photo by Matthew Millman Photography, courtesy of SFMOMA.
    Bedford has known Sherald and her work for years—he came to San Francisco in 2022 after six years leading the Baltimore Museum of Art. The artist, who now lives in Jersey City, moved to Baltimore in her twenties to get her MFA at the Maryland Institute College of Art (MICA). Even after graduating in 2004, Sherald called the city home for many years.
    “She was one of the last artists to study with abstract expressionist Grace Hartigan,” Garza said.
    Many of Sherald’s early works feature an element she developed under Hartigan’s tutelage, with unusual bubble-like splatters spreading across her bright, jewel-toned backgrounds.
    Amy Sherald, Saint Woman (2015). Private collection, courtesy of Monique Meloche Gallery and Hauser & Wirth. Photo by Joseph Hyde, courtesy of the artist and Hauser & Wirth, ©Amy Sherald.
    “Grace was really giving her a hard time in the studio, trying to get her work to push the boundaries of her practice,” Garza said. “In a moment of frustration, Sherald splattered turpentine on a canvas with the intention of starting over. When she came back to the studio the next day, she discovered there was this beautiful texture, and she realized she could harness that to great effect.”
    That surface is characteristic of Sherald’s earlier paintings. Later, she began favoring a more flat colored ground, and in more recent works the figures—now there is often more than one—have begun to live in a less abstract world, like the golden field in Planes, Rockets, and the Spaces in Between (2018).
    Amy Sherald, Planes, Rockets, and the Spaces in Between (2018). Collection of the Baltimore Museum of Art, purchase with exchange funds from the Pearlstone Family Fund and partial gift of the Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts, Inc. Photo by Joseph Hyde, courtesy of the artist and Hauser & Wirth, ©Amy Sherald.
    But from the beginning, Sherald’s work resonated with viewers, her deft use of grayscale adding a reverence and gravitas to her loving depictions of African Americans. Her work highlights the importance of representation, of Black people controlling their own images, and of those images becoming part of the American art canon.
    When the artist was commissioned to create Michelle Obama’s official portrait for the Smithsonian Institution’s National Portrait Gallery in Washington, D.C., it seemed like the kind of star-marking turn more common in the movie industry than the art world.
    The painting was a sensation, inspiring a childrens’ book and drawing such huge crowds that it needed to be moved to a bigger room, and Sherald signed with mega-gallery Hauser & Wirth. (The painting’s forthcoming homecoming as part of the exhibition’s tour will be the NPG’s first-ever solo show of a Black woman artist.)
    Amy Sherald, Michelle LaVaughn Robinson Obama (2018). Collection of the National Portrait Gallery, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C. The National Portrait Gallery is grateful to the following lead donors for their support of the Obama portraits: Kate Capshaw and Steven Spielberg; Judith Kern and Kent Whealy; Tommie L. Pegues and Donald A. Capoccia. Photo courtesy of the Smithsonian’s National Portrait Gallery.
    But if it seemed like Sherald had arrived overnight, her sudden rise to prominence upon the portrait’s unveiling in 2018 was actually the culmination of years of carefully honing her practice. She had won the NPG’s $25,000 portrait competition in 2016, and by that point there were 50 to 60 people and institutions on the waitlist to buy one of her paintings.
    The lenders for the SFMOMA show, therefore, are some of the country’s most seasoned collectors. (There are loans from the likes of CNN’s Anderson Cooper; sportscaster Bryant Gumbel, artist couple Rashid Johnson and Sheree Hovsepian; investment billionaire Robert F. Smith; and collectors Anita Blanchard and Martin Nesbitt; and Bill and Christy Gautreaux.)
    “There were only two or three cases where multiple works came from a single collection. Each loan has its own series of negotiations, and the collectors are really advanced collectors,” Garza said. “Our standard loan agreement didn’t work for a lot of them!”
    Amy Sherald, They Call Me Redbone, But I’d Rather Be Strawberry Shortcake (2009). Collection of the National Museum of Women in the Arts, Washington, D.C., gift of Steven Scott, Baltimore, in honor of the artist and the 25th anniversary of National Museum of Women in the Arts. Photo by Lee Stalsworth, courtesy of the artist and Hauser & Wirth, ©Amy Sherald.
    All but two of the works are hung at eye level to meet the viewers’ gaze, and, as per the artist’s preference, without frames. The two exceptions are Sherald’s only commissioned paintings—the Obama portrait, and one of Breonna Taylor, created for the September 2020 cover of Vanity Fair at the behest of guest editor Ta-Nehisi Coates.
    Sherald wanted the museum to show the painting of Taylor, who was killed in her own home in 2020, alongside other depictions of young women, in a gallery that’s been titled “The Girl Next Door.” (The work is jointly owned by the Smithsonian National Museum of African American History and Culture in Washington, DC, and the Speed Art Museum in Taylor’s hometown of Louisville, Kentucky.)
    For Sherald, but also for Taylor’s family, who were closely involved in the work’s creation and its display here, it was important to show the portrait alongside other depictions of young women. Each of the figures in the gallery is someone you or I could know—a sister, a friend, a neighbor—a reminder for viewers that Taylor was more than the tragic headlines that surrounded her death.
    Amy Sherald, Breonna Taylor 2020). Collection of the Speed Art Museum, Louisville, Kentucky, purchase made possible by a grant from the Ford Foundation; and the Smithsonian National Museum of African American History and Culture, Washington, D.C., purchase made possible by a gift from Kate Capshaw and Steven Spielberg/the Hearthland Foundation. Photo by Joseph Hyde, courtesy of the artist and Hauser & Wirth, ©Amy Sherald.
    Seeing the painting in person for the first time, I got full body chills, overwhelmed by the senseless loss that it represented. The work’s power is undeniable, Taylor seemingly frozen in time against a sea of aqua, the background inspired by her birthstone, alexandrite.
    “Sherald wanted to create a sense of radiance around the figure, a color that would energize her, to try to capture her very warm, vital presence, hoping to create an image that would live on and outlive the narrative of violence around her,” Garza said.
    Amy Sherald, For Love, and for Country (2022). Collection of the San Francisco Museum of Modern Art, purchase, by exchange, through a gift of Helen and Charles Schwab. Photo by Don Ross, ©Amy Sherald.
    The exhibition also marks the first time SFMOMA has been able to display its own Sherald, the 10-foot-tall painting For Love, and for Country (2022) acquired in 2024. It is the artist’s version of the famous Alfred Eisenstaedt (1898–1995) photograph V-J Day in Times Square (1945), of a soldier kissing a nurse in jubilation upon learning that World War II was over. In her work, Sherald reimagines the figures as two queer Black men—a fitting work for the museum given San Francisco’s historic embrace of the LGTBQ community.
    “Sherald is really trying to bring stories into the museum that haven’t been told before—and they are Black American stories,” Garza said.
    That impulse was also part of the inspiration for the title of the exhibition, “American Sublime,” which Sherald had kept in her back pocket for years waiting for her first major retrospective. (It is from a poem by Elizabeth Alexander, an African American writer who is president of the Andrew Mellon Foundation.)
    Amy Sherald. Photo by Olivia Lifungula, courtesy of Hauser & Wirth.
    “The sublime relates back to an 18th century concept of experiences of great emotional magnitude, to experience great beauty or awe,” Garza explained. “And it’s Sherald’s hope that this exhibition will help people celebrate the beauty and the persistence and pride of Black people, and the flourishing of Black culture, despite centuries of racism and oppression. These images hopefully run counter to the narratives of violence or poverty that have characterized fictions of Black life in U.S. media and culture.”
    “Amy Sherald: American Sublime” is on view at the San Francisco Museum of Modern Art, 151 Third Street, San Francisco, California, November 16, 2024–March 9, 2025; the Whitney Museum of American Art, 99 Gansevoort Street, New York, New York, April 9–August, 2025; and the National Portrait Gallery, 8th Street NW and G Street NW,  Washington, D.C., September 19, 2025–February 22, 2026. More